They do now..its a trend
Plenty of others have accessed already
It's available under a Creative Commons license as clearly mentioned in the paper itself. I.e. sharing is perfectly ok as long as proper accreditation as per the license is given.
They do now..its a trend
Plenty of others have accessed already
It's available under a Creative Commons license as clearly mentioned in the paper itself. I.e. sharing is perfectly ok as long as proper accreditation as per the license is given.
Display MoreHi Jed, I would hazard that most people in the UK live in 100 year old terrace houses or 1960s blocks of flats or small council houses.
Even looking at detached houses, usually there is enough of a drive at the side for a car (UK car not a US truck) and a small garden at front and or back.
But yes I don't know how many would be suitable for heat pumps.
I am planning to move in the next few years and my next house I will be looking to have solar panels on the roof battery storage, as that combination seems to make the most sense. We did have have the prolonged British rain punctuated by a heat wave that broke some records. If that is going to become more common then I think I would prefer an air conditioner to a heat pump.
I would be interested to hear what you think about the comment from Sabine, are you more optimistic?
I live in the UK in a modernish 4 bed detached house. That heat pump unit Jed distributed would take up about one fifth of my (precious) back garden space. No thanks.
>This is fig leaf approach.
It's also not necessarily legally correct. E.g. some publications require that an author promises not to do this (sometimes just for a period).
Small anecdote but every 6 months or so I have at least a publication "licensing pool" contact me suggesting we need a license. This is even for sharing titles and urls (which contain titles) internally. Yes, this can be a copyright violation in the UK. E,g, NLA Media Access - Rights licensing and content distribution
>Ed thinks that as long as I share papers with a limited number of people in a closed group, I am not violating copyright laws.
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm very confident that this is not correct. I imagine its quite small risk (and you talking about doing it here in public adds to that), but it's not me taking the risk.
Display MoreHere's their patent application from 2022.
https://patentimages.storage.g…70eb7f/WO2022175691A2.pdf
The principals are all apparently Russian, with a presence in London to raise funding.Vladimir Leonov whose work is claimed as the basis of the device, is known for his superunification theory and offshoots quantum energetics and anti-gravity.
George Egely's involvement gives the work some credibility. Alan Smith may be restricted by NDA from discussing his recent work with the Egely device, but any direct impressions he can share would be appreciated!
Despite having 114 claims, I think this is going to struggle a bit.
Alan features quite a bit in this video - (772) ENG8 EnergyCell validations - August 2023 - YouTube
For me, they have been careful to appear to make claims about results, whilst not making claims about results
Some strong accusations in this. Most interesting to me is the work histories of some involved.
For some reason, I'm not shocked. I know Donal O'Connell and will ask him about Eng8 next time I see him, but I doubt he does much more than give some advice on IP issues and strategy.
If no one finds an error after years of searching, we must conclude there is no error.
Or we (e.g.) conclude not enough skilled, knowledgeable people cared, for whatever reason, either then or now. Unfortunately I doubt this will be settled either way until there is a commercial application available in the market. My fingers are crossed.
It's mainly politics and statistics, and plenty of misunderstanding and mis-interpretation of both.
Can't wait for 1/6.
I would say that this is because, in this particular case, what is being attempted to patent is a new understanding about what matter is and how it behaves, which in turn opens many practical aplications. You can’t patent new physic principles or models, only their application to specific problems. However this does serve the purpose of public disclosure and public record that Jurg went for.
Yep, you can't patent that sort of thing.....and I know from personal experience that Sharon M Davis is a tough cookie. I would not like to go up against her with a self-penned, self-prosecuted patent application that was clearly deficient.
I highly doubt that the purpose was for "public disclosure and public record" there are much cheaper ways to do that than a USPTO application, and if that was the purpose, why try to argue for the patent?
This shows that Nar has not watched the video as this topic is raised by you in the talk with Guido.
Correct I have not watched the video, nor have I much knowledge in tritium, hence asking the question. Sorry, I have missed if there is some point you are trying to make.
And yet.... Not.
Because no-one outside the LENR community is researching such transformations - they undoubtedly would if they believed this.
Tritium is valuable isn't it? ....are they making commercially viable amounts?
Equally you could agree that since no good evidence of LENR exists we could all stop looking, go down the pub, and barbecue the planet.
To be fair, that's what most of the world has done as far as I can tell. There is little point IMHO in arguing now over historical papers that garnered little attention at the time. I'm more interested to see what the likes of e.g. CP/Miura manage to achieve as credible results going forwards. Then we/they can work backwards as to who to credit for the journey.
Display More
Please be aware of the 2 week quarantine requirement if you will be trying to go through German immigration. If you instead do a layover, you won't need to quarantine. I'm not sure which countries are considered "virus-invariant".
UPDATE:
Germany is lifting all restrictions as of March 1 including proof of vaccination, wearing masks, anything.
A quick google suggests that there were no virus variant of concerns areas anyway since China was removed in Feb.
But they do. I often use google search to find things in this place that the forum's own search function cannot.
Don't bring facts to the table in this thread Alan,
"industry will come around once BrLP has something that works, regardless of the science" - this is very true but based on the comments does not appear to be the top priority for BrLP (whilst claiming it works and simultaneously burning through 3.3mil a year)??
It also doesn't align with "The use of these funds is to work with an outside firm to finalize commercial packaging for the Suncell in advance of production."
If these comments are accurate, it really doesn't give a good impression.
I just love the Q&A....
The headlamp that is used in the livestream, has it been modified in any way and if so, how has it been modified?
WE PUT A LED INSTEAD OF THE ORIGINAL XENON LAMP
What is the model of the lamp being used in the live stream? ?
HONDA HEADLIGHT FOR MOTORCYCLE
Display More
SALM K.:
The setup is in France, controlled in remote from the USA,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
LOL. How many hours until this statement is shown to be a lie?
Pretty sure Frank said he'd been in the lab and it was in Italy?
Did he forget to get rid of the protection plastic film or something? It's still visible in the live stream top view.
He forgot to take it off before turning it on and then was too blinded by the brilliant light to notice! lol.