The Playground

Article on medicalxpress.com

Analyses suggests pandemic fatalities in India were much higher than estimated.

When a COVID-19 wave hit India over the winter and spring of 2021, hospitals were filled beyond capacity, oxygen was nearly impossible to obtain, and community networks for tending to the dead were overwhelmed. Government reporting at the time put the death toll at under a million.

A more accurate measure of COVID-19 deaths in India puts that number at 3.2 million people, according to a paper co-authored by Associate Professor of Economics Paul Novosad and an international team of researchers.

The team reviewed data on all causes of death from an independent survey of 140,000 adults, and from two government data sources including deaths reported in health facilities and registered deaths in 10 states in India. They compared these counts to the patterns found in previous years without COVID and found that total deaths increased by 26% to 29% in the COVID period compared to total deaths in past years. This range was consistent across separate data sources, the researchers wrote.

Quote from ZenoOfElea

They compared these counts to the patterns found in previous years without COVID and found that total deaths increased by 26% to 29% in the COVID period compared to total deaths in past years.

You are correct. Several 10 million Indian workers have been locked out and sent home with no money --> no food. So many 100'000 simply did starve away or couldn't afford simple drugs you e.g. need for diabetes I ...

Further, in the first phase, the mafia was in full control and took away Ivermectin in most states.

But believe me India will be one of the first state that will sue and jail the responsible for this top down FM/R//B genocide.

The India death figures past march 2021 are correct as a deep research paper did show. We can only discuss the deaths during the alpha phase.

Quote from Wyttenbach

But believe me India will be one of the first state that will sue and jail the responsible for this top down FM/R//B genocide.

They already sued WHO: Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin | Columnists | thedesertreview.com

Quote from stefan

I do not think the excess death will be espec

This is the key figure we will have to look at. To repeat it once more: Switzerland never had excess mortality among age <65. The last delta surge since September 2021 brought a tiny peak among age >65. This peek vanished with Omicron.

Mortality monitoring (MOMO)

The FSO's mortality monitoring system is designed to detect whether the weekly number of deaths is higher than expected at that time of year. Mortality rates…

www.experimental.bfs.admin.ch

But most terror states now simply cheat teh figures. It was easy to spot down in UK (no corrected) and other places. The worst cheaters are USA/DE/FR that simply like to go on with "vaccination" of babies.

German Nazi-camps was the most disgusting experience so far. But what the FM/R/JM/B pharma mafia still does today outperforms them by magnitudes. 7 mio. victims until 1945 now 2 billion victims. If you got an Pfizer RNA chemo you most likely will have complications in the near or far future. Lets hope its mild. Where mild means only 1 million will die from Pfizer crap during the next 10 years.

People still don't get it:: There never was any excess mortality among age <65!!

Vaccines (in most countries) never did protect you or your kids/grand parents from CoV-19.

The Phase III studies of Pfizer/Moderna never did show any effect if you look at the 6 months data!!!

As Italy/UK data does show:: At most 17% of the official CoV-19 death have been from CoV-19. The majority always was with!

To many fools live on this planet! What explains the current pre-war state ...

People from Donbas now shoot in direction of Russia to construct a fake attack!

Here the data of a seriously reporting country:: Netherlands:: https://www.worldometers.info/…irus/country/netherlands/

Peek cases Delta: Nov. 22 22'000 Peak deaths 60.

Peek cases Omicron: 100'600 peek death now at 13. factor 25 lower.

Now compare this with other states and you can see the amount of cheating that e.g. is done in USA. Or Israel.

Israel is a special case. In the first 2 Omicron weeks 3x more boostered did die than unvaxx. Solution to hide this effect ?? Just look out for deaths with Omicron to fill the statistics.

Israel claims 2x more deaths from Omicron than Delta.. Hahahahahahha. How foolish can one be to fake the data by more than 25x !!! What did Pfizer pay for this fake??

My daughter rang me from Spokane,Washington today..

Her friend needs a vaccine passport to be able to travel with the team on mission.

the usual stuff "cast out demons.. heal the sick..preach the word"

Q. Should Amanda take an antihistamine?..

I said Antihistamine is OK,, but cast out Pfizer... J&J is preferable.

I was just being proactive to help the mission..

Germany Changes National Guidelines for COVID-19 Vaccines & Embraces Aspiration

Germany Changes National Guidelines for COVID-19 Vaccines & Embraces Aspiration

The actual cause of severe adverse events associated with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are speculative, raising numerous questions as well as controversy over

trialsitenews.com

The actual cause of severe adverse events associated with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are speculative, raising numerous questions as well as controversy over these vaccines. TrialSite has shared documentation linking biodistribution anomalies in preclinical studies but that lacked true evidentiary value. Some recent reports reveal the spike protein may circulate in ways not anticipated. Others, including the health authorities of Germany and Denmark now believe the root of the cause is a serious flaw in the procedure for administering the injection. Back in November of last year TrialSite showcased this possible cause.

Last Thursday Germany changed their national guidelines on how to administer SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. As reported by TrialSite community member Paul Elkins, that European Union nation now strongly advised aspiration to reduce the chance of an inadvertent vascular injection. Follow the link to the updated German guidelines (in German). TrialSite attaches a Google Translated version.

The newly added aspiration topic is covered on page 14. The main thrust is as follows:

“The vaccination must be administered strictly intramuscularly (im) and never intradermally, subcutaneously or intravascularly (iv). Animal models of perimyocarditis (clinical and histopathological) have been reported following direct intravenous injection of an mRNA vaccine.* Although accidental intravascular injections occur only rarely with an im vaccine application, aspiration with im application is useful for COVID-19 vaccinations to further increase vaccine safety.”

The injection site, the deltoid, was chosen for convenience rather than clinical reasons. The ventrogluteal site is free from blood vessels and nerves and has the greatest thickness of muscle when compared to other sites. However, for a massive vaccination campaign targeting billions of people where speed and efficiency is critical the deltoid represents a more efficient option.

Aspiration would remove the added risk of increased vasculature in the deltoid. However, the reason aspiration is not part of the guidelines can be traced back to a World Health Organization (WHO) report titled “Report to SAGE on reducing pain and distress at the time of vaccination” dated 3/31/2015. The justification for the WHO’s change in guidance to no longer aspirate was based on this study to possibly reduce pain. In their own assessment of the evidence, WHO’s authors graded the evidence that not aspirating reduced pain as “very low quality”. Yet, they still changed the guidance and with it increased the chances of accidental IV injections.

Aspiration is a simple measure to reduce the rare but real risk of SAEs of myocarditis/pericarditis.

This study below surveyed 164 RNs and found Forty percent reported having aspirated blood at least once, whereas 6 RNs (4%) noted blood aspiration ≥13 times. Blood aspiration occurred most frequently in the dorsal gluteal (15%) and deltoid (12%). Based on the findings, it is recommended that RNs use a decision-making process to select the safest technique for IM injections. If a parental medication has different administration rates, dose, viscosity, or other concerns when given IM versus intravenously (IV), aspiration during IM administration should be implemented.

The paper predates COVID-19 by five years. This recent study was designed to see if intravascular vaccine administration could lead to myopericarditis. They used an in vivo mouse model with mRNA vaccines and showed that indeed injecting intravenously led to a much higher occurrence of myopericarditis. This recent similar study showed intravascular AstraZeneca vaccine administration leads to VITT in an in vivo mouse model.

There are some national public health agencies that have long believed in the risk reduction from aspiration is justified such as Denmark:

Denmark’s prescient decision to aspirate all SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations led to much lower incidences of myocarditis. “In young people aged 12-17 years (boys and girls combined), the rate of myocarditis or myopericarditis in Denmark was 1 per 100 000 with BNT162b2 compared with 18.5 per 100 000 in Hong Kong, and roughly 7 per 100 000 in Israel (ages 16-19 years). In 12-39 year old males after the second dose of BNT162b2, the incidence of myocarditis or myopericarditis in Denmark was only 1.8 per 100 000, compared with >7 per 100 000 in 16-39 year old males in Israel.”

See the links below:

https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/375/bmj-2021-068665.full.pdf

Some people argue that aspiration is not possible with auto-disable syringes which are used by some. However, it is indeed possible to aspirate with auto-disable syringes as shown in this document by a large manufacturer of auto-disable syringes that provides guidance on the technique:

Other arguments against aspiration being the root cause of the increased risk of myocarditis compared to background include the following:

If aspiration is the cause, why is the rate of myocarditis higher in the second dose vs the first?

While It’s true that the risk of an IV injection is the same from the first dose vs the second dose, the state of the host’s immune system changes. Upon the first dose the subject’s immune system is typically naive to the antigen. Therefore, when the Spike is created in the myocytes by an IV injection the immune response is relatively mild. However, if an IV administration occurs on the second dose the immune system has been primed. When the myocytes create the spike antigen the adaptive arm will elicit a robust response. Cytotoxic T cells will destroy myocytes presenting the antigen, antibodies will mark Spike presenting cells for phagocytosis and the myocardium will become inflamed.

If aspiration is the cause, why is there a higher incidence in men versus women?

Could the answer be that it’s because men have much more vasculature in their deltoids than women? Therefore goes this argument the chance of accidentally injecting into a vessel is much higher.

Why is the rate so much higher in young men?

Again, young men have much more vasculature. There is also a much higher prevalence of athletics in young men that increases vasculature which would also increase the risk of an inadvertent IV injection.

Here are additional published papers that include the importance of aspiration:

“The deltoid site has been used in clinical settings and is preferred in Japan because it is easily accessible for clinicians and also for patients to expose. Since this area has a small mass, clinicians may only administer small amounts of medication. Although the site located at a one to three finger breadth below the acromion is generally recommended for an IM injection at the deltoid site, we previously reported that the site at a three finger breadth (approximately 5 cm) below the acromion was not acceptable for IM injections because it is close to the axillary nerve and posterior circumflex humeral artery (PCHA).”

“It was, therefore, cautioned that intramuscular injection of vaccine should be done with aspiration technique to avoid inadvertent vaccine administration into deltoid muscle vasculature that may lead to vaccine distribution to distant tissues which increases the risk of developing severe adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. Poor injection technique may also cause a direct injury to the axillary nerves adjacent to the injection site in deltoid muscle that may lead to peripheral neuropathy.”

Another country now follows the evidence indicating the importance of aspiration prior to injection. Kudos to the German Health advisors for following the evidence and making an informed decision to adapt their procedures and we suspect, now will greatly reduce the risk of severe adverse reactions after vaccination. Now if only the Germans and Danish can convince the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Blood Aspiration During IM Injection - PubMed

The World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention no longer recommend aspiration during intramuscular (IM) injections. The purpose…

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

The simple fact is that whatever you inject intramuscular, subcutaneous or otherwise, some of the injected material will end up in the blood! Thus we have the immediate allergic reactions ending up doing most harm in the cardiac tissues. When will we learn to stop messing about with molecular biology? We do it because it is new and ingenious BECAUSE WE CAN! WITHOUT ANY TRUE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FUTURE AS TO WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT!

UK: People with COVID in England won’t need to self-isolate

UK: People with COVID in England won't need to self-isolate

LONDON (AP) — People with COVID-19 won't be legally required to self-isolate in England starting in the coming week, the U.K. government has announced, as part…

apnews.com

LONDON (AP) — People with COVID-19 won’t be legally required to self-isolate in England starting in the coming week, the U.K. government has announced, as part of a plan for “living with COVID” that is also likely to see testing for the coronavirus scaled back.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson said ending all of the legal restrictions brought in to curb the spread of the virus will let people in the U.K. “protect ourselves without restricting our freedoms.” He is expected to lay out details of the plan in Parliament on Monday.

“I’m not saying that we should throw caution to the winds, but now is the moment for everybody to get their confidence back,” Johnson told the BBC in an interview broadcast Sunday.

“We’ve reached a stage where we think you can shift the balance away from state mandation, away from banning certain courses of action, compelling certain courses of action, in favor of encouraging personal responsibility.”

But some of the government’s scientific advisers said it was a risky move that could bring a surge in infections and weaken the country’s defenses against more virulent future strains

Wes Streeting, health spokesman for the main opposition Labour Party, accused Johnson of “declaring victory before the war is over.”

Johnson’s Conservative government lifted most virus restrictions in January, scrapping vaccine passports for venues and ending mask mandates in most settings apart from hospitals in England. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, which set their own public health rules, also have opened up, although more slowly.

A combination of high vaccination rates in the U.K. and the milder omicron variant means easing restrictions didn’t lead to a surge in hospitalizations and deaths. Both are falling, though the U.K. still has Europe’s highest coronavirus toll after Russia, with more than 160,000 recorded deaths.

In Britain, 85% of people age 12 and up have had two vaccine doses and almost two-thirds have had a third booster shot.

Now the Conservative government says it will remove “all remaining domestic COVID regulations that restrict public freedoms” as part of a “move away from government intervention to personal responsibility.”

The legal requirement to isolate for at least five days after a positive COVID-19 test will be replaced with advisory measures, and the coronavirus will be treated more like the flu as it becomes endemic.

The new plan foresees vaccines and treatments keeping the virus in check, though the government said “surveillance systems and contingency measures will be retained” if needed.

“COVID will not suddenly disappear, and we need to learn to live with this virus and continue to protect ourselves without restricting our freedoms,” Johnson said.

The announcement will please many Conservative Party lawmakers, who argue that the restrictions were inefficient and disproportionate. It could also shore up Johnson’s position among party lawmakers, who have been mulling an attempt to oust him over scandals including lockdown-breaching government parties during the pandemic.

But scientists stressed that much remains unknown about the virus, and future variants that may be more severe than the currently dominant omicron strain.

The New and Emerging Virus Threats Advisory Group, which advises the government, said last week that the idea viruses become progressively milder “is a common misconception.” It said the milder illness associated with omicron “is likely a chance event” and future variants could be more severe or evade current vaccines.

Epidemic modelers who advise the government also warned that “a sudden change, such as an end to testing and isolation, has the scope to lead to a return to rapid epidemic growth” if people throw caution to the wind.

Scientists also cautioned against scrapping free rapid coronavirus tests, which have been distributed by the millions during the pandemic. Health officials say the mass testing has played an important role in slowing the spread of the virus.

Scientists are also concerned the government might end the Infection Survey conducted by the Office for National Statistics, which is considered invaluable because it tests people whether or not they have symptoms.

“This is not the time to take risks,” said Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, an umbrella group for state-funded health authorities in Britain. “We need to operate in an evidence-based and incremental way.”

Quote from Fm1

If aspiration is the cause, why is the rate of myocarditis higher in the second dose vs the first?

After 4 billion vaccines doses and some 500'000 cripples...it is really time to stop the cultivation of future big pharma customers....(Hint:: No more left over...)

Quote from Fm1

People with COVID-19 won’t be legally required to self-isolate in England starting in the coming week, the U.K. government has announced, as part of a plan for “living with COVID” that is also likely to see testing for the coronavirus scaled back.

Omicron is a harmless virus for most.

Now the German press/TV just switched to present fear mongering cancer patient telling people "I'm vulnerable". This is bullshit since day one. If they take high dose V-D3 VK-2 zinc quercetin and keep budenoside/NO_x spray ready - or Benatene nose lotion nothing will happen.

Ivermectin/Blackseed are excellent early treatments. What kills cancer patients are vaccines because these make them more vulnerable to autoimmune reactions. Most cancer patients anyway show no serious antibody reaction on a RNA gene therapy. Also most children develop no antibodies after a Pfizer "vaccination" as studies did show.

It's great time to stop the Dr. Mengele addicts now - for ever!

Quote from THHuxleynew

What we have is inconsistent and non-replicable. A 30% increase turns into a 5% increase or less when measured more accurately. We do not have a setup that delivers clearly above possible errors results - unless Mizuno's systems do that. I will agree with you about that as a modern example breaking my statement only if we have those systems measuring well above error increase from different calorimetry setups in different labs run before professional calorimetrists.

If I look around any lab I have been associated with, I see all sorts of assays, instruments, and protocols that are in constant use but originated many years ago. When first published these procedures were novel, but now they are simply tools. They are in still-constant use not because we are still researching exactly what the original lab was looking at, but because they are reliable ways of getting from a to b in a lab when we are now looking at f, g, and h. Science is incremental and it is this inheritance and constant deployment of other's findings and methods that allows scientists to go a little farther each time.

This is a pattern that goes beyond simple replication. It isn't just an isolated result being repeated by other groups. It is a once-novel result being turned into a tool of everyday research.

I don't see this pattern in LENR. People reference past work but they don't make use of it. They are forever trying new procedures, working on them for 2-3 years, then abandoning them. It seems to me that a possible reason for this is that none of it was ever true.

Some British humor with Dr. Campell! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56gG_OD9KjM

About why is Ivermectin officially allowed in USA/Japan and aspiration...

Fascinating to see that ONS now confirms even higher antibodies levels than we did set as lower limits. This also for April 2021 - what is crucial for fake vaccine protection reported that in fact is recovered protection.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) latest insights - Office for National Statistics

Why you should not vaccinated any child at all you directly see from above. >90% are already recovered and have natural immunity.

Or explained the correct British way by Dr. Campell:: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcsHKUZhB4E

Quote from Fm1

Germany Changes National Guidelines for COVID-19 Vaccines & Embraces Aspiration

Anyone have a link to this?

Quote from Alan Fletcher

Anyone have a link to this?

Anglos are bricklayers

Quote from Alan Fletcher

Anyone have a link to this?

Quote from Alan Fletcher

Rossi-Sez

...

[ Note: French punctuation may be used in neighboring regions - Northern Italy, Parts of Germany etc ]

Sure Alan. This person asking a typical puppet layup question with Rossi's answer already planned was in no way a sock puppet, even with the telltale space before the question mark.

Will someone with JONP privileges please ask Rossi about Levi's UNIBO paper retraction? I would like to see what he says.

Coronavirus: The vaccinated deaths disparity

Coronavirus: The vaccinated deaths disparity | Cyprus Mail

How Covid deaths are classified, the dominant variant, the timing of doses are all complicating factors The narrative surrounding Covid-19 vaccines has changed…

cyprus-mail.com

How Covid deaths are classified, the dominant variant, the timing of doses are all complicating factors

The narrative surrounding Covid-19 vaccines has changed since they were introduced over a year ago. The early promise was that they provided immunity from infection, but it’s now increasingly clear that they do not.

Whether a vaccinated person remains less likely to catch and transmit the virus than an unvaccinated person – or whether it’s about the same, or indeed whether the vaccinated are more likely to be infected when it comes to Omicron – is still unclear, with data to support all three positions.

The consensus, however, is that vaccines help when it comes to illness, hospitalisation and death.

This is now a central plank in the campaign to get people vaccinated. It’s also led to a perception that vaccination confers near-total protection against severe Covid.

“The best safeguard is to be triple-jabbed, rather than taking your chances with the virus,” said medical correspondent Fergus Walsh on the BBC News at Ten last Tuesday. Closer to home, health ministry permanent secretary Christina Yiannaki noted on February 5 that “the chance of going to the intensive care unit is zero when you are vaccinated”. (To be fair, the Greek word ‘midenizei’ could also translate as ‘close to zero’.)

The day before Yiannaki made that statement, the monthly report for the month of January – our worst month for deaths since the start of the pandemic – came out, seeming to support her claims.

The mortality data in Cyprus is very encouraging for vaccination. Of the 104 people who died of (or with) Covid in January, 69 per cent were unvaccinated and a further 20 per cent partly vaccinated. Only 11 per cent were fully vaccinated: two per cent double vaccinated and nine per cent boosted.

Some other countries (notably Greece) have posted similar figures. Strangely enough, however, the mortality data in many other places is wildly different.

Britain is a good example: the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) issues a ‘Covid-19 vaccine surveillance report’ every week, giving very complete data. The report for Week 5, issued on February 3, looks back at the first four weeks of 2022, i.e. the month of January.

The figures for Covid deaths within 28 days of a positive specimen (p. 45) show 5,554 deaths in total. Of these, only 1,015 (18 per cent) were among the unvaccinated; 1,703 (30 per cent) were double vaccinated, and 2,585 (46 per cent) were boosted.

This is almost the opposite of the Cyprus figures. What’s more, UKHSA data has shown a similar trend for months now.

Another example comes from Australia. The New South Wales government issues daily bulletins about Covid (they can be found at http://www.health.nsw.gov.au). On February 5 – the day of Ms Yiannaki’s statement – the state reported 18 deaths from Covid, with the following breakdown: “Two people who died had received three doses of a Covid-19 vaccine, 14 people had received two doses, one person had received one dose, and one person was not vaccinated”.

That makes five per cent unvaccinated, 77 per cent double vaccinated, 11 per cent boosted.

Nor was this a fluke result. The next two days saw another 42 deaths reported: seven (16 per cent) unvaccinated, 27 (64 per cent) double vaccinated, seven (16 per cent) boosted. The remaining person had received one jab.

The first thing to note, of course, is that these results don’t indicate a lack of vaccine effectiveness. Even if 70 per cent of deaths are vaccinated, that’s still less than the percentage of the total population who are vaccinated. One should also note that Australia’s death rate is very low, for a country that never had a big wave prior to this one.

In other words, being vaccinated does remain pretty helpful (at least so far) against severe illness and death. Still, ‘pretty helpful’ is a whole other ballpark from ‘near-total protection’ – especially at a time when vaccine magic is being used as a justification for SafePasses and restrictions on the unvaccinated. Why the divergence?

“Different countries will have different data, and will also present it differently,” Christos Petrou, associate professor at the University of Nicosia and part of the government’s vaccination advisory team, told the Cyprus Mail.

“It depends on the virus that is circulating, and many other factors that may be different between one country and the other,” agrees Petros Karayiannis, professor at the University of Nicosia Medical School and also a government advisor on coronavirus.

One example offered by Karayiannis has to do with Covid restrictions: “If you relax the measures – if you remove the masks, the distances and what have you – like the US and UK have done, that’s why they see more vaccinated people going down with the infection.”

Maybe so – but surely that speaks to cases, not severe illness necessarily. Besides, what about New South Wales? They’re still quite strict in Australia.

Karayiannis points to the difference that the dominant variant in Australia is currently Delta, whereas our cases stem from the less-lethal Omicron. Again, though, we’re talking about deaths; almost all of our mortality in Cyprus is still from Delta.

Another potential confounder, mentioned by both scientists, has to do with the timing of the second and third dose, especially in the immunocompromised.

“If they’ve been vaccinated, and seven months have elapsed and they haven’t had the third dose, for example, then it’s understandable that some may get sick,” says Karayiannis. “You need to compare like for like, and I’m not sure whether we can do that because of all the variables.”

Again, this sounds plausible – but then, are local differences really so sizeable? Haven’t countries been marching largely in lockstep, at least in the West? Don’t we in Cyprus have roughly comparable vaccination rates with these other nations, and didn’t we all start boosting at around the same time?

After all, we’re not talking about a small disparity in data: 11 per cent vaccinated deaths is a long way from 75-80 per cent. Even in the US – with a lower vaccination rate than Cyprus – former CDC director Robert Redfield noted back in October, in his capacity as senior advisor to the governor of Maryland, that over 40 per cent of deaths in Maryland were fully vaccinated. The Maryland Department of Health later clarified that the true figure was 32 per cent – but also added that they expected that percentage to grow, “as more Marylanders get the vaccine”.

Cyprus, for whatever reason, has different numbers. “I don’t understand what other factors may be at play here, but this is what we see,” says Prof. Karayiannis firmly. “Deaths – the vast majority – are non-vaccinated people, and that’s it.”

Could it have something to do with what Petrou alluded to, that countries “present” their data differently? After all, 96 of our 104 deaths in January had Covid as the ‘underlying cause’, presumably meaning other comorbidities were also present. Is it perhaps a case of the unvaccinated ranks being swelled by end-of-life patients – those who were too old and frail to take a vaccine anyway – whom we classify as Covid deaths, whereas other countries don’t?

Hard to say, without further research. One thing, however, seems clear. Vaccines do seem to help against severe Covid – but the narrative that getting jabbed in a timely fashion is enough to keep you out of the ICU should be taken with a pinch of salt.

Quote from Fm1

Hard to say, without further research. One thing, however, seems clear. Vaccines do seem to help against severe Covid – but the narrative that getting jabbed in a timely fashion is enough to keep you out of the ICU should be taken with a pinch of salt

But vaccines help to cripple footballers! Next victim in Bayern Munich team. (Inside text in German..)

Fußball-Bundesliga: Der FC Bayern weiter mit großen Problemen

Gegen Schlusslicht Greuther Fürth zeigt der FC Bayern lange wieder eine schwache Leistung. Erst Treffer von Lewandowski und ein Eigentor retten die Münchner.…

www.faz.net

Latest with Omicron "vaccines" only help Pfizer & investors to make money and of course help health system to generate more live time patients.

After heart inflammation you go to regular controls (echo cardio) that cost from 500$ upwards.

To understand why today's vaccine data is 90% fake look at the ONS paper (linked some posts above) that shows the recovered rate.