Brillliant Light Power Posts Demo Video

Quote from Wyttenbach

If you have that many questions Axil, then it's time to read a Mill's paper...

The sun-ceel is ignited by two supercaps with an ultrashort > 10kAmp pulse at a few Volts (avg 5). Therof it's not classical LENR. Albeit the underlaying physic must be the same...Silver is just a trick to convert SoftX/XUV radiation in to the visible near UV band...

Just to say the same as everybody else: Rossi has nothing, no current no, intense light. It's just a wierd dream...
The end of his dream will be either a public accepted certification. Or a jump off a cliff.

Mills said in january that the silver had an affinity on its surface with water that other metals did not have. That special surface feature makes silver better than other metals.

Mills has a pile of silver to melt before he can fire the supercaps. From a cold startup because of that, Mills needs kilowatts of stored "up-front" power to melt that silver. Am I not seeing that requirement correctly?

Quote from Keieueue

So it was your friend's renters who stabbed him to death, disfigured him

Ah, I discovered how to block a user. You are blocked. Sayonara.

At 1:27:00 the calorimeter results state 144 In and 440 0ut. COP = 3.06

Mills claims 300-600 Kws out and 25 Kws in,

You can expect COP = 3 or less in the steady state.

Why is the a difference between actual and claimed power output.

There is a difference between instantaneous power and average power.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsed_power

"Steady accumulation of energy followed by its rapid release can result in the delivery of a larger amount of instantaneous power over a shorter period of time (although the total energy is the same). Energy is typically stored within electrostatic fields (capacitors), magnetic fields (inductor), as mechanical energy (using large flywheels connected to special purpose high current alternators), or as chemical energy (high-current lead-acid batteries, or explosives). By releasing the stored energy over a very short interval (a process that is called energy compression), a huge amount of peak power can be delivered to a load. For example, if one joule of energy is stored within a capacitor and then evenly released to a load over one second, the average power delivered to the load would only be 1 watt. However, if all of the stored energy were released within one microsecond, the average power would be one megawatt, a million times greater. Examples where pulsed power technology is commonly used include radar, particle accelerators, ultrastrong magnetic fields, fusion research, electromagnetic pulses, and high power pulsed lasers."

Rossi's claims are far ahead COP = 200 vs. 3.

Quote from axil

Mills said in january

Are you watching videos or reading papers? One happens in the schoolyards the other is a prerequisite of science!

Quote from Wyttenbach

Are you watching videos or reading papers? One happens in the schoolyards the other is a prerequisite of science!

I Read SunCell info but I did not come across that factoid about silver and water. But more generally, I have read more papers than you can shake a stick at both LENR and straight and yet when I reference them in posts, this collection is NEVER read by the audience. They just chant the refrain: "word salad". Such is the behavior of trolls.

Quote from axil

Rossi's claims are far ahead COP = 200 vs. 3.

This is well said: A.R.'s claims = no proof...until now.

Mills has published his setup, machine details and also the third party measurements... I guess he also would wellcome Jed for a walkin in and confirming a test. But this could cause other disturbances...

Quote from axil

You can expect COP = 3 or less in the steady state.

If you calculate in energy units, then it is simple: COP = kWh_out/kWh_in. your assumption of a COP of 3 is just phantasy with no background.

BDW: In Mills machine it absolutely easy to calculate the input power, something Jed would like. It's just the energy needed to load the capacitors! times number of firing them.

The 1MW is for a pulse. Yes getting 1MW continuously will be something, but by controling the
frequency you can control the continuous output - also the amount of energy in the pulse
can be controled as well. The main cost is the CV's. I don't think that
this is an issue more than that his market speak seam a bit hyperbolic. The validations shown
speak about Joules and they did get a COP of about 100 no? BrLP mentions that these validations
have been done independently by whom we don't know and exactly how we don't know. Again
Mills laughs about how the fact that QM and Akademic folks have adviced against the BrLP have
enabled them to construct quite a patent portfolio. I agree that this is perfect for them. So
atm they have a process that yields a COP of 100 from water according to possible independant
validators. It would be a pretty nasty and huge hoax if they don't exist. No way that such a process would
not end up in a usefull way in a few years time if not a hoax. Maybe not as a giant light bulb. But you can
always produce steam and the high power is needed to heat the bulb to 3500. Surely heating
steam would be possible whatever happens. A question to Mary and Jed. Was the validation
method of such a bad quality that, if they where honest, could miss out a COP of 100, would that
be possible judging from their ability to handle technology because that is what is obvious. They
have quite a technological skill.

Quote from Wyttenbach

If you calculate in energy units, then it is simple: COP = kWh_out/kWh_in. your assumption of a COP of 3 is just phantasy with no background.

BDW: In Mills machine it absolutely easy to calculate the input power, something Jed would like. It's just the energy needed to load the capacitors! times number of firing them.

I wonder if the power to melt the silver at startup should be subtracted from the power total output. What would Jed think? Is that a fraud move to include that setup power?

Quote from Shane D.

Pardon my religion Kei, but Jesus, you are clueless. You just cannot keep saying crap like that. You are too smart. I would be happy were what you say merely "word salad", as a particular poster here excels at (shout out to Axil) , but come on man, it is too serious. Stick to the high ground.

It's word salad when I directly quote the articles I favor, so maybe it's those who receive the info and not those who post the info. Maybe there is an expertice in understanding FUD around these parts. You know, it takes a while to become a FUD experts; facts take a holiday and they don't look like they are coming back.

Once they are put into operation I am not sure that SunCells would regularly be turned off. The cost of operation is cheap enough to just keep it running and dump power and heat. I am just guessing with this scenario, but Mills in his talk said that people need to get comfortable with the concept of dumping power, and that there will be no more scarcity with electricity. I did think it was interesting that he brought up fast food restaurants as an early adopter. They use a lot of power and are open for most hours of the day.

At first, I don't understand how hydrino could generate the energy and to remain unnoticed in nature, being the most stable form of hydrogen in this way. The most stable form of matter is simply the ash of every reaction and it should occur everywhere... We have lotta iron and nickel in
the universe, because these elements are product of many exothermic nuclear reactions - but no hydrino meteorites are still raining on our heads. Which is strange.

IMO the fundamental quantum state is the most stable form of matter instead due to omnipresent vacuum fluctuations, which keep everything in motion. If some subquantum states could exist by some miracle (Mills is saying, the spherical orbitals radiate poorly the energy, so that
they're especially prone to forbidden electron transitions), then they must be very unstable and as such endothermic: their formation would consume energy instead of generate it. They would be interesting from theoretical perspective - but practical?

If I should take Mill's experiments seriously, I'm forced to consider some fusion mechanism behind it instead of hydrino. My impression is, the Mills team doesn't take their own energy release numbers with seriousness as the apparatus to harvest these releases appear to be
consistently under-engineered from iteration to iteration.

In essence the video can be explained classically with pointing to extremely high current densities, which BLP is reportedly using. The 2 Volts would correspond 4 kA current. Note also, that the whole electrode stack looks quite well thermally insulated.

Zephir_AWT:

*Unnoticed... Most hydrino hypothosized formations are just H2 hydrinos that does not react and float into space. A very small fraction may be incorporated into chemical bounds. But the fraction is so
small that it is not noticable, it really is like finding a needle in a haystack. In space it stays in the form of H2 and all rocks and ice out there does not accumulate hydrinos.

* So if quantum vacum fluctuation motions everything why are we seeing hydrogen at all. That's because the fusion is voided due to potential barriers. It's the same with hydrinos. You need to overcome
a barrier that is too high for any quantum fluctuations if quantum fluctuations exists which Mills theory does not need.

* underengineered! you got to be kidding, did you not see all the technologies that the SUNCELL is borrowing from in the video. I would argue the opposite. It is a bit overengineered. A lot of hi tech usually
comes with scarce materials which essentially mean that you can't roll it out to the world without draining some material resources. Maybe it is not a problem, but I would try to produce steam first and only
later try out the light bulb approach. Making steam would mean an order of magnitude less engineering in order do overcome the high temperatures.

* Well yes it's a big welder and you can produce any fireworks classically. But with a COP of 100 - no way that can be done classically - or do you have an argument for getting that gain chemically? Did you see the
spectral validations, you get spectra that matches mills prediction precisely - and no classical match is found. No, this can only be interpreted classically if it is a hoax, and then it is probably the most advanced hoax
ever seen, which in it self would be fascinating.