Yes I agree Axil It makes perfect sense that high voltage is used and the fact its also a requirement according to the patent (I'll take your word for it and check later) hopefully will settle this particular issue.
New E-Cat QX Picture and New Rossi-Gullstrom Paper (Very high COP reported with Calorimetry)
-
-
Rossi recycles the same rewarmed scam again and again.
Hey, you left out the plumber's bag.
I still want to know how you're going to hook up any kind of fluid-based calorimeter without a toolbag like that.
(And as I said in the Prominet pump test thread .. I need one of those. Or maybe you can donate an up-to-date Bose-Einstein-Condensate-Phonon-Soliton-Plasma assembly kit. ).
-
Yes I agree Axil It makes perfect sense that high voltage is used and the fact its also a requirement according to the patent (I'll take your word for it and check later) hopefully will settle this particular issue.
See Post #114
-
(Bonhoffer) Stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of the good than malice.
See: The Fundamental Laws of Human Stupidity
http://www.quadllc.com/Quadriv…_theory_on_stupidity.html
. . .
Fifth Law
The stupid person is the most dangerous type of person that exists.
This is probably the most understandable laws to the common knowledge that intelligent people, hostile as they may be, are predictable, while stupid people are not.
In addition, its base Corollary: "A stupid person is more dangerous than a bandit" leads us to the essence of the Theory of Cipolla. There are four types of people depending on their behavior in a transaction:
- Misfortune (Unfortunate) who with his action tends to cause damage to himself, but also creates a benefit to someone else
- Smart/Intelligent: who with his action tends to create advantages for itself, but also creates the benefit to someone else
- Bandit: who with his action tends to create advantage for himself, but at the same time hurts someone else
- Stupid/Fool: who causes damage to another person or group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring a loss . . .
-
It will be simple to use. Barty linked to the developer docs.
And no, nothing better, because the centralized ones get shut down by the SEC and other agencies. The solution to this is to decentralize it.
yes I can understand. The European, or probably anybody but the US can have much better odds on sporting bets by using sites we can't.
-
EXACT quotation, bitte
"Dummheit ist ein viel gefährlicherer Feind des Guten als Bosheit"
Dietrich Bonhoeffer - Widerstand und Ergebung, Brief 43
>>>>> "The advantage of being intelligent is that we can always play stupid, however being the opposite is completely impossible"
Woody Allen self quote
-
Nuances for IH/Woodford
-
If you want news about the E-Cat QX my advice is to look at http://e-catworld.com/. You are not likely to find actual news here.
-
You are not likely to find actual news here.
why? -
"Dummheit ist ein viel gefährlicherer Feind des Guten als Bosheit"
Es ist nicht Dummheit sondern Normbegabung! -
Admit it Adrian, you are addicted to LF. You have 92 posts turning your nose up at this place, yet here you are...still. Understandable, as ECW is boring, and more like a club of the like minded, where Rossisays should not be challenged, and if so, very mildly, and infrequently....or risk censorship.
Whereas here, your new home, is a challenge. Everything one thinks, or believes, can, and usually is challenged. If you can not defend your position intelligently, logically, or rationally...without resorting to nose up your arse contempt , then you will not be respected.
-
AhiAhi - I guess you should mention the rest of the story regarding the referenced Ni alloy - I can provide a hint that you conveniently left out. Cu.
How'd you get those Asti slides anyway?
-
@DW,
It doesn't matter, really. BLP, Brillouin, and Rossi are far and way beyond a 5% signal. Hope you're having fun chasing down those ambiguous signals though. See you in the funny pages.
-
Its the finish line IHFB and I don't see you anywhere.
-
Admit it Adrian, you are addicted to LF. You have 92 posts
As a member since 2014 with 92 posts I'm addicted?
Your lack of analytical ability explains many of your other posts.
-
Its the finish line IHFB and I don't see you anywhere.
It might be for IH. Just wish you guys hadn't set the field back and turn the voracious anti-LENR crowd on us. But maybe with time I can let these frustrations go. We'll see.
-
As a member since 2014 with 92 posts I'm addicted?
Your lack of analytical ability explains many of your other posts.
Hmm Adrian, you have been here since 2014, and still a "student". Moi has been here far less time, but a "master". Sorry, I gave you more credit than deserved. Back to ECW for you!
-
Stop quoting Rossi. He's a liar and a criminal. Rossi and his cronies were personally and entirely responsible for an environmental disaster that cost dozens of millions of dollars to clean up. Where in the world is it documented that Rossi was not responsible for Petroldragon other than in Rossifiction?
You should inform yourself better before spitting judgments. Rossi was acquitted of those charges, as you can read in this article of the Corriere della Sera (an Italian newspaper):
-
Anyway, it is a kind of inverse science or reverse science to take tidbits of information from a sparsely written experimental writeup and attempt to construct a fuller account that shows why the conclusions might be true assuming the existence of LENR. In the usual way that things are done, even in LENR research, the people doing the experiment make a case to a critical audience that what they're describing is real and not a figment of their own imagination. And so the authors provide an extended description, going through hoops to anticipate and rule out all of the possible criticisms that might be brought up. What we have here is different from that, where part of the readership have taken it upon themselves to go through hoops on the authors' behalf. Some of the audience have somehow been persuaded to assume the burden of evidence.
I agree that the debate is fundamental in the scientific sphere and that this should normally follow an article and not precede it. In this case, however, the article is of a theoretical nature and there is only a reference to the experimental part. The experiment was not described in detail because it was not the purpose of the article that, I repeat, is focused on theoretical concepts. Perhaps another article will later come out where the experimental details will be described, or these explanations will be given to the October demo. In this case, filling in many forum pages on guesswork and assumptions seems a bit useless.
-
AhiAhi - I guess you should mention the rest of the story regarding the referenced Ni alloy - I can provide a hint that you conveniently left out. Cu.
How'd you get those Asti slides anyway?
https://www.iscmns.org/work12/program.htm
EDIT Also here: http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ClaytorTNsearchfore.pdf (2012)
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.
CLICK HERE to contact us.