KevMo - IH and Rossi entered into a contract for Rossi's IP.
***There were 2 contracts. The first was a contract for a yearlong demo for which IH paid $11M. The 2nd was a contract for IP transference which would take place based upon an independent 3rd party report written about the demo, and basically if it were a positive report, then IH pays $89Mil, and a negative report would dissolve their relationship. It was a positive report. But IH refused to pay and so there was a lawsuit.
Basically what Rossi did was that he stopped trusting them (of course, he isn't so trustworthy either). So he set up his demo to have a Fred Flinstone mode, basically it only works when he's there. IH wanted his IP but was sick of dealing with him. His Fred Flinstone strategy forced the issue, and the positive report was the basis for how IH was going to lose. So they settled, and gave back ALL of Rossi's (supposedly worthless) IP. If his IP was worthless then why did the original lawsuit stipulate that Rossi deliver it?
IH paid up and Rossi failed to deliver then made his fateful decision as the fraudster to sue for fraud.
***IH paid for the $11M demo. They were supposed to pay $89M when there was a positive TIP report. They balked. Because Rossi's demo only works when Rossi is there. That issue isn't covered in the contract, but judges traditionally look at how these things are handled in the relationship. IH didn't have any trouble with Rossi camping out there 15/7 during the demo phase, so any judge would accept that "the box comes with an engineer" as IBM used to famously tout.
The "reports" were all either fraudulent or directly tainted by Rossi.
***They were independent reports that IH agreed to. They agreed to who the party was that was gonna witness the demo , who would write it, all of it. They had no trouble with that part until they realized that Rossi had pulled a Fred Flinstone.
I have further proof of that if anyone wants to legally tango.
***I doubt that. If you had proof, it would have been in court and IH would have gone to trial and kicked Rossi's ass. So either you got proof afterwards or... I'll say it, right here, right now... OR (got that...it's an OR statement -- OR:OR or OR) OR you're just lying right now. I have my own thoughts on that issue.
The truth that came out in discovery has doomed his business prospects into perpetuity.'
***Doesn't look doomed to me, but then Rossi is Rossi and some of his actions make no sense.
You didn't read anything that holds up your lie that IP was transferred to others because it doesn't exist.
***See now, right here you're laying on the bullshit real thick, because Rossi would have backed up his allegation in open court. You can't deny that Rossi alleged it, that he was headed for trial and this was his ostensible strategy. Basically, you are full of shit.
You are not able to point to a document that supports your false claim.
***Again, more bullshit from you, because that case was settled.
Further, Rossi proposed a settlement just as the trial was starting - there is no other fact available to you on that subject.
***There's ALWAYS a settlement proposal just as a trial is starting. ALWAYS.
KevMo - yet another tiresome instantiation bomber troll from Planet Rossi who cannot interpret reality / facts (intentionally in my opinion).
***Dewey, paid mouthpiece for a company that tried to steal $trillion IP, and who ostensibly got duped by an "inept" con man.