...
Mizuno reports increased excess heat
-
-
link?
-
Read web address in capture, genius
-
...
-
...
That plot is a weird one, with the nice smooth climb, bump, then bumpy all the way after that.
-
link?
Try this
新規事業地上の太陽といわれる核融合は、無尽蔵の海⽔から抽出した⽔素を⽤い、CO やウラン由来の放射性物質を放出せず、家庭・事業所⽤から⼤規模発電 まで対応できる究極の再⽣可能エネルギーですが、実⽤化は来世紀という夢物語でした。それを、株式会社北海光電⼦はナノ触…hpeem1-jimdo-com.translate.goog -
Try this
~3MJ Nov 2019..Helium production confirmed
comparison 1.3 MJ NIF...August,2021
National Ignition Facility experiment puts researchers at threshold of fusion ignitionOn Aug. 8, 2021, an experiment at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s (LLNL’s) National Ignition Facility (NIF) made a significant step toward ignition,…www.llnl.gov -
Ahlfors ,
First I saw of hpeem1.jimdo.com. Thanks.
M Muto is the President of Hokkai Kaddenshi as I mentioned earlier today. He was one of the Mizuno replicators.
Looks like the article on their website was written on April 12, 2021. A little about HK :
Hokkai Koden Co., Ltd. is a core company of the consortium that was established in June 2008 based on the results of the research and development project "X-ray microscope capable of simultaneous observation, chemical analysis, and electrical characteristic measurement" by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. It is based on industry-government-academia collaboration of Hokkaido University, Hokkaido Industrial Technology Center, Suga Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Hayasaka Riko Co., Ltd., Tanaka Co., Ltd., and JEOL Ltd.
-
Unfortunately there was a falling out between HK and MTI. HK was announcing to investors that he was one who invented MTI’s technology when in reality he simply did calorimetry on units supplied by MTI. We had our lawyer write cease and desist letter to him. Looks like we need to send another letter.
-
The cylinder looked familiar..
-
Unfortunately there was a falling out between HK and MTI. HK was announcing to investors that he was one who invented MTI’s technology when in reality he simply did calorimetry on units supplied by MTI. We had our lawyer write cease and desist letter to him. Looks like we need to send another letter.
The HK article was written with an emphasis on HK leading the way -not MTI, which I found curious. So thanks for filling in the missing pieces.
Sounds like Japan is almost as sue happy (litiginous) as we here in the US. Not sure if that is a compliment or not.
So can we assume we will not hear from HK again?
-
Prof. Muto underwent a Dr. Jekyll Mr. Hyde transformation when he saw it work and the green monster of greed came out. I was as surprised as anyone, he seemed like a stand up guy
-
Anyway thanks for the heads up. He was supposed to remove all references to MTI from his website and company information. I have forwarded this link to our lawyer
Regarding the last data I am waiting for official approval from their BoD before disclosing their name. It is a major public company which focuses on automotive parts production.
-
Anyway thanks for the heads up
"Thanks" go to Ahlfors
-
Yes Ahlfors seems to have a knack for digging out obscure and interesting information!
-
I find curious that in a joint venture with a big boiler manifacturer you try to hire a boiler engineer. Are you sure you need one?
-
I find curious that in a joint venture with a big boiler manifacturer you try to hire a boiler engineer. Are you sure you need one?
Are you asking me? Mizuno and MTI have nothing to do with CP/Miura. But yes that sounds strange and the work location was a metal fab company. Anyway eventually the truth will come out.
-
Dear JedRothwell i have no doubt this way of experiment were successfull sometime and no doubt about Pr Mizuno deep knowledges, involvement .. However do you have some infos from him to know how it could explain reproductibility pbs of his method ?
In the upcoming ICCF22 conference, Tadahiko Mizuno will report increased excess heat with nickel mesh coated with palladium. The results are dramatic, so we decided to upload a preprint of his paper. To understand the calorimetry, you have to read his ICCF21 paper. Unfortunately, the ICCF21 Proceedings have not yet been published. So I decided to upload preprints of both papers:
ICCF21: Mizuno, T. and J. Rothwell, Excess Heat from Palladium Deposited on Nickel (preprint). J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., 2019. 29
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTexcessheata.pdf
ICCF22: Mizuno, T. and J. Rothwell. Increased Excess Heat from Palladium Deposited on Nickel (Preprint). in The 22nd International Conference for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science ICCF-22. 2019. Assisi, Italy
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTincreasede.pdf
Here is the abstract for the latest paper:
Abstract
We have developed an improved method of producing excess heat with nickel mesh coated with palladium. The new method produces higher power, a larger output to input ratio, and it can be controlled effectively. With 50 W of input, it produces ~250 W of excess heat, and with 300 W it produces ~2 to 3 kW. This paper is a comprehensive description of the apparatus, the reactant, and the method. We hope this paper will allow others to replicate the experiment.
Update 2019.09.22
MizunoTincreasedea.pdf
Update 2019.09.23 video from ICCF22
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.Lors de la prochaine conférence ICCF22, Tadahiko Mizuno signalera une augmentation de la chaleur excessive avec un treillis en nickel recouvert de palladium. Les résultats sont spectaculaires, nous avons donc décidé de télécharger une prépublication de son article. Pour comprendre la calorimétrie, il faut lire son article ICCF21. Malheureusement, les actes de l’ICCF21 n’ont pas encore été publiés. J'ai donc décidé de télécharger des prépublications des deux articles :
ICCF21 : Mizuno, T. et J. Rothwell, Excès de chaleur du palladium déposé sur du nickel (préimpression). J. Matière condensée Nucl. Sci., 2019. 29
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTexcessheata.pdf
ICCF22 : Mizuno, T. et J. Rothwell. Augmentation de la chaleur excessive du palladium déposé sur du nickel (préimpression). dans La 22e Conférence internationale sur la science nucléaire de la matière condensée ICCF-22. 2019. Assise, Italie
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTincreasede.pdf
Voici le résumé du dernier article :
Abstrait
Nous avons développé une méthode améliorée de production de chaleur excessive avec un treillis en nickel recouvert de palladium. La nouvelle méthode produit une puissance plus élevée, un rapport sortie/entrée plus élevé et peut être contrôlée efficacement. Avec 50 W d'entrée, il produit environ 250 W de chaleur excédentaire, et avec 300 W, il produit environ 2 à 3 kW. Cet article est une description complète de l'appareil, du réactif et de la méthode. Nous espérons que cet article permettra à d’autres de reproduire l’expérience.
Mise à jour 2019.09.22
MizunoTincreasedea.pdf
Vidéo de mise à jour du 23/09/2019 de l'ICCF22
[média]
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
It's interesting to reread after a while this great work from Mizuno/Rothwell about the R20.
I reread how i tried to discuss engineering with Jed and how fast it became over by TTH pollution.
Pretty sure he is payed by oil companies or something like that to perturb the field as best he can..
Nice today to reconsider the Mizuno work in parallel with the more recent Alexandrov work for example.
Especially about the thermal gradient involvement.
So: comments.
The previous results were too low to be clear, given the various experimental uncertainties.
These results as tabulated show +50% measured from this calorimeter at 200W in (therefore 300W out).
These figures are absolutely good enough to be definitive with this type of calorimeter (which I think is entirely reasonable to use here).
The R20 results headlined are not presented properly in the paper. There is a reference to 250W excess heat output in the calorimeter but no other data. I'll ignore these till better data is published. In any case, +50% is from my POV as good as say +100% in this equipment if the setup is properly checked. There is an anecdotal reference to the device performing as a 3kW heater in a room. I'll definitely ignore that!
Now, what I need. In order to be publishable anywhere, a report on describing highly surprising experimental results would need this. Maybe it would need more for LENR due to historical issues, but the bare minimum below does not exist yet in this write-up nor the previous one. (For an example if how to write a more acceptable experimental report take the experimental parts of Staker 2018 elsewhere described).
For this calorimeter:
- Raw data from which the results are derived: temp in, out, air speed, air cross-section, air speed profile, exact geometry over which these are measured
- Details of blower power vs voltage and back pressure, blower spec, Blower voltage in experiment. (Useful as sanity check for airflow measurements)
- Description of precisely how calibration is done, and of calibration methodology. Ideally replacing the reactor by an identical object (with same D2 connections) without nickel gauze heated electrically
- Clear description of the previously done tests of air speed, temperature constancy, quantitative estimate of errors due to these.
- Clear description (true in this case, I believe) that D2 source could not be heating the device by burning D2. Clear methodology pointing out why total amount of D2 is known/limited and much less than that which could result in energy generated.
Discussion:
- Personally I most distrust the airflow measurements. Getting this wrong by 50% would explain these results. We do not actually know where the air speed was tested. Lack of data here means we cannot check this.
- I think the middle of tube air speed, air temperature, can easily be determined. Airflow is more difficult because flow velocity profile will be non-uniform, reducing to zero at edges of a pipe and higher in the middle. Mizumo talks I think of checking airflow at different points around the reactor. that does not help, and also does not answer the velocity profile question. This could make the +50% apparent results, if ignored.
- The other uncertainties seem well bounded by me and although we would need careful and detailed results I feel these are less problematic
- Calibration is potentially a way round the uncertainties here, independent of measurement and/or flow velocity profile calculation. But the similarity of conditions between calibration and active tests must be detailed.
Caveat - these are just my initial reactions - I may change/add to this on further study and perhaps I've missed something.
Regards, THH
PS - it would be really helpful for everyone involved with LENR to understand the level of care in write-up required for any Journal paper - let alone an experimental paper describing results that are extraordinary. Conference papers are often less good, but a high impact conference paper (peer reviewed full text with a high reject rate) also needs to be quite well written. I feel that people think LENR papers are rejected from bias when in fact they would be rejected anyway as poorly written even if on a topic that was interesting but with expected results.
There are a few authors in the field who write decent papers. Many of these do get published.
-
robert bryant It would have been more interesting to study the convective flows inside the reactor than those from calorimetry. These were underestimated and even ignored, and their contribution to xsh was not considered at all for memory ?
Professorial wisdom "turbulent flow in a pipe would not have a flat velocity profile"
Wow Zeus .. you actually read THH.. well done
There was turbulent flow in the Mizuno aircalorimeter
which made the velocity and flow measurement so much simpler.
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.
CLICK HERE to contact us.