Claiming vaccination is better than natural immunity by using improper aligned data. Reality (Israel 2 mio base data): Natural infection protects at least 25x better than "vaccine" (Pfizer)!
I have some sympathy with that claim. Natural immunity after severe disease can protect the survivors well. You might though argue that those predisposed to die would already be dead.
But:
(1) You agree that mild infections (even more asymptomatic infections) protect much less well than serious infections
(2) You are (at best - I do not trust figures without detailed references) looking at protection from symptomatic and reported infections. That misses a lot of the least protective infections.
Anyway - using improper aligned data for claims is not quite as bad as claims based on no data at all. Or claims based on raw data that ignore Simpsons Paradox etc.