Inventing their own science is rampant in the LENR theorest interest space. It stated right at the beginning with P&F proclaiming that the reaction was Cold fusion. This reinvention of facts must come from a lack of familiarity among those that are interested in cold fusion with accepted science theories, history, and pending research. Here is a few observations about this lack of factual rigor in science.

Randle Mills has overcome this issue by converting many of his followers to his hydrino theory. Mills took an observation about a very special condition involving superconductivity and turned it into an alternate science.

It is my belief that every experimental finding in Cold Fusion should be referenced against an existing tenet of science. Every facet of that tenet should be compared against the findings in the cold fusion experimentation.

When a good match is found, the science can predict how the course in the experimentation in cold fusion shoud take. In this way cold fusion data and science data can be beneficial to all concerned.

Another offender of valid science principles in Rossi. Rossi states that the electron cluster becomes coherent from the action of zitterbewegung.

Rossi got the Zitterbewegung theory from Giorgio Vassallo, a software engineer. This theory is both invalid, ineffective and inappropriate from multiple perspectives. The electron cluster concept is valid. Rossi's explanation of spark production of the reaction must have come from experimentation. The reference to Ken Shoulders' Electrum Validum (EV) is also OK.

In more detail. the original perspective on zitterbewegung interprets the x in the Dirac equation as the position observable of a particle. But that modern perspective is that that interpretation is a mistake. Zitterbewegung is just one of the consequences of that mistake.

The modern perspective is that QFT is the proper foundation for relativistic quantum physics. In QFT, x isn't an observable at all. It's a parameter, basically a continuous "index" that is used together with the spinor index k to parameterize the field operators ψk(t,x). Observables are constructed from the field operators, and they are operators that act on a Hilbert space.

Because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, the electron cannot be precisely known. The spacetime location of the electron is properly conceptualized as a indistinct cloud where its position can only be approximated. As such ZBW cannot be determined. The x in the math is therefore undetermined.

Zitterbewegung is an artifact of mistaking the parameter x as a position observable.

Relativistic QFT doesn't have a strict position observable.

In relativistic QFT because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, particle-detection observables can't be both perfectly noise-free and perfectly sharply localized in a finite region of spacetime. We can have one or the other, but we can't have both, and nothing about this statement contradicts anything we know from real experiments.

In the case of ZBW, theory is mislead by the math and is not real.

Quote from Alan Smith

One swallow doesn't make a mistress, one EVO doesn't rule out mesons,

I heard that Holmlid's company that intended to use muons to develop muon catalyzed fusion was terminated because Holmlid's meson process did not produce muons. Is that true?

https://www.lenr-forum.com/attachment/19453-appendix-20-information-to-nfe-shareholders-december-2021-pdf/

Quote from Alan Smith

Depends where you heard it. I doubt it's true.

I looked in my Mail to remember

Sveinn Ólafsson	Thu, Feb 25, 2021, 3:51 PM

Quote

Dear Axil

Nothing what you say is wrong since what we know about Leif’s UHD is still so little. We are looking now into weather we are just accelerating protons to > 10 MeV energies That will knock neutrons out of some nuclei and create normal science I have still not seen muons or mesons using better methods than Leif.

So it is ongoing project

All those stainless steel pipes Sveinn showed you in that last video you produced was intended to determine what particles were being produced by the UHD.

By the way, my theory that EVOs are produced by a light activated optical cavity in a superconductor is supported by the UDH experiments. The palladium hydride, the LION diamond lattice compression of deuterium, The high Dv/Dt spark compression of hydrogen, the cavitation production of ultra dense water and others all support the superconductor based Higgs mode theory.

When it come to lattice compression of a hydride, a superconductor will be created long before any pressure based fusion will occur.

Quote from Zephir_AWT

Just dry fact: Holmlid states muons in half of his studies... There is nothing to believe in.

What Holmlid is generating with each laser pulse is many Exotic Vacuum objects (EVO) that contain bubbles of the Higgs field. Holmlid mistook these bubbles of Higgs field for mesons.

The Higgs mechanism is normally associated with high energy physics, but its roots lie in superconductivity.

Higgs, Anderson and all that

There is evidence for a Higgs mode in disordered superconductors near the superconductor–insulator transition.

As early as the early 1960s, solid-state physics was complementing theoretical particle physics in the form of the recently deceased Nobel Prize winner in physics, Philip Anderson. Anderson was an outstandingly creative pioneer of solid state physics. He was also interested in particle physics. In 1962, he published a paper demonstrating how photons (or light quanta) obtain mass in a superconductor. This inspired Peter Higgs to publish his theory of the Higgs field in 1964 and led to him and François Englert being awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 2013.

“In solid-state physics, we speak of the Anderson-Higgs mechanism”, says Kaiser. Higgs spectroscopy has now brought these ideas back into solid state physics. Like the Higgs boson, the Cooper pairs, which are each formed from two electrons and carry superconductivity, belong to the quantum mechanical family of bosons. Bosons tend to assemble in a common quantum state. The Cooper pairs form a large quantum mechanical wave, a collective quantum object that can move through the superconductor as an electric current without friction.

A laser pulse into the Ultra dense hydrogen (UDH) superconductor will form a optical cavity in which a Bose condensate of polaritons will form in the electron cloud that surround the positive core of the UDH. This condensate will produce a self-confining bubble of Higgs field derived from the nature of the UDH superconductor. This Higgs field in the superconductor may well be identical to the cosmological Higgs field.

The question arises: Is the Higgs field in a superconductor(SCHF) the same field as that of the cosmic Higgs field (CHF) or is the SCHF different than the (CHF).

The SCHF produces mass in photons whereas the CHF does NOT produce mass in photons. SCHF might be the anti field of CHF.

Does SCHF change the mass of the electron in any way? This requires some looking into.

But on another issue, how does 1 dimensional superconductivity act in the LENR reaction.

Near the end of the video after some explanation about superconductors, there is an explanation about what a one dimensional superconductor is. I want to show what the SCHF can do in the simplified case of a one dimensional superconductor.

Some background: Dr. Brian Ahern showed that the LENR reaction occurs in nanoparticles. Nanoparticles can form one dimensional superconductors as constrained by their size. This experiment will show how nanoparticles produce the LENR reaction when a laser pulse irradiates gold nanoparticles. These nanoparticles demonstrate ballistic (one dimensional ) superconductivity.

Ballistic conduction

Ballistic conduction - Wikipedia

In this experiment, the LENR reaction only occurs when the LENR light pulse is active. A radioactive isotope provides a probe to explore the nature of the LENR reaction. Since there is no lattice involved, n o fusion reaction is possible. No excess heat is produced. Various types of laser pulses are used in this experiment which reveals the details of the mechanisms of the LENR reaction. The basic take away from this experiment is to show that the LENR reaction is a unified electroweak based reaction.

Radioactive decay half-life acceleration cause by Electronweak force mediation.

Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6276

Accelerated alpha-decay of 232U isotope achieved by exposure of its aqueous solution with gold nanoparticles to laser radiation

A.V. Simakin, G.A. Shafeev

This reference sheds light on the posit that an Unified Electroweak reaction accelerates radioactive decay through Higgs field based super-conduction carried through Bose condensation of polaritons. With this posit in mind, experimental data elucidates what the optimum duration of the pumping laser pulse time-frame should be to optimize the LENR reaction.

Abstract

"Experimental results are presented on laser-induced accelerated alpha-decay of Uranium-232 nuclei under laser exposure of Au nanoparticles in aqueous solutions of its salt. It is demonstrated that the decrease of alpha-activity strongly depends on the peak intensity of the laser radiation in the liquid and is highest at several terawatt per square centimeter. The decrease of alpha-activity of the exposed solutions is accompanied by the deviation of gamma-activities of daughter nuclides of Uranium-232 from their equilibrium values. Possible mechanisms of the laser influence on the alpha-activity are discussed on the basis of the amplification of the electric field of laser wave on metallic nanoparticles."

This experiment speaks against the posit that accelerated radioactive decay is caused by any interactions with neutrinos purported by the Russian Meme. The mechanism of polariton Bose condensation causation involves the generation of polariton plasma and associated intense Electroweak fields that has been generated around a gold nanoparticle that produces a critical density of LENR active surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) cloud which acts as a LENR active superconductor in which Electroweak stabilization of radiation occurs in the vicinity of the gold nanoparticle. The SPP and Its vortex tube are pictured below along with associated theory.

https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/11/e1500807.full

Vortex and half-vortex dynamics in a nonlinear spinor quantum fluid

The referenced article shows that the polariton Bose condensate reduces the 69 year half-life of U232 to 5 microseconds when the LASER pulse is active. It addition, the acceleration of radioactive decay of the 4.5 billion year half-life of uranium is sufficiently half-life accelerated to produce significant detectable uranium decay products. The Half-life decay is not caused by increased radiation, but by a change in the nature of the unstable isotope itself.

Quote

It is reasonable to suggest that the alpha-decay proceeds during the laser pulse, while the spontaneous decrease of alpha-activity during exposure is negligible. This means that the activity drops down by a factor of 2 during 5 ms, which is the total duration of all 150 ps laser pulses during exposure. In other words, the half-life of 232U in the laser field is 5 ms instead of 69 years. About 10^10 nuclei of 232U decay during laser exposure. Another infrared laser radiation with pulse duration of 350 ps affects the alpha-activity of the solution to lesser extent despite to much higher number of laser pulses.

Both the power of the laser pulse and its duration are important factors in producing optimum half-life decay acceleration. The nanosecond laser pulse length is too short to optimize radioactive decay acceleration as well as the 350 ps laser source. The 150 ps laser source seems to be a better fit to match the 50 ps life span of the individual polariton which comprise the Bose condensate aggregation is the resonance value for optimization of radiation decay.

Another insight gleaned from this experiment is that the length of the laser pulse does not produce continuing radioactive decay acceleration. The LENR activity is constrained by the lifetime of the polariton condensate and is active only as long as the polariton condensate is active.

https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-3e84f447a73d63fd700d993c68bcc488

The trapping potential for the EVO, is infinite because the spacetime that the EVO has transformed into is anti-De-Sutter space. This means that for all r , t is also infinite. The Bose condensate in Anti De-Sutter spacetime will not lose coherence due to high temperatures in our universe (De-Sutter spacetime) no matter what temperature that the EVO finds itself in. No temperature no matter how high will destroy the EVO; not even on the surface of the Sun.

Hollow-core Fibers

Hollow-core fibers are optical fibers with a hole on the fiber axis. Despite the low refractive index of the whole region, optical guidance can be achieved…

www.rp-photonics.com

https://www.rp-photonics.com/bg/products/guiding_photonics/hollow_core_fibers.jpg

A wire that will carry superconductive current at any temperature as follows: fill the hollow core of an optical fiber with Ohmasa gas and pass laser light through the hollow core to activate the EVOs carried by the gas

Scientists observe 'negative mass'

Quote from Drgenek

The LENR activity results from the relationship of the electroweak force and special relativity (gravity). The electronuclear gravity is present when the EVO radiates photons or particles in a phat type of equation. For example, when one supplies energy sufficient to break bonds to any other these elements: hydrogen, helium, lithium, beryllium, boron, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, or indium. Breaking bonds in each of these cases, if sufficiently intense, will create a string between an electron and a Majorana neutrino. The decay of various sting states produces quantized radiations. For example, an EVO produced from water has these quanta, E = n² (13.583784145 eV). For example, glow discharge in H₂, D₂ and water per Ed Storms Amazing Results produced deuterons at energies in MeV :0.45, 0.77, 1.2, and 1.6. This glow discharge LENR reaction radiation fits this phat equation: E=n²(.0457) MeV

The phat or string states are characterized by their radiation. The phat states create the electronuclear gravity that creates the EVOs. The gravity of EVO is an accelerator that causes fusion.

There is no need for complicated explanations. Rather we need people who can reason with the simple math and data fitting.

My fellow LENR researchers, which is a better case a planetoid (EVO) based on electronuclear gravity or a polariton condensate?

Display More

Sean Hartnoll | From Black Holes to Superconductors 1 and 2

These two videos explain many concepts that are central to the EVO phenomena. The duality between a black hole and a superconductor/quantum liquid is one such duality. Because of this duality, it is easy to become confused about how electromagnetic based black holes come into being. The EVO acts like a black hole but this black hole functionality is one with major limitations.

There are many papers that cover the relationships between black holes and Bose condensates. One important duality between black holes and quantum liquids that is important to science was posited by Majorana as discussed in this lecture.

One observation about how hard it will be to describe the vacuum reaction to science is the stove piping of expertise that exists in science. Sean Hartnoll, a condensed matter specialist conducted this lecture for top people in other disciplines, including Leonard Susskind who was new to this information.

When someone tries to explain black hole dualism with Bose condensation, they must be very careful in not assigning gravitational causation to electroweak related subjects.