Display MoreYou perhaps have paid attention to only part of the thread. I am a relatively undramatic person. However when accused by multiple people here (with no pushback from mods) of being a profit-motivated company with multiple employees all pretending to be me to create Russian disinformation I get annoyed.
Maybe the US would not understand it but sentiment against Putin for consistent and egregious breaking of any sort of rules-based order (the EU likes rules) is strong. You know, land grabs from neighbours, radioactive poisoning of enemies on foreign soil, that sort of thing.
"Pushing back" is not the same as wanting to stifle dissent.
I guess anyone in Russia now understands that - and I hope you do too. Fan clubs cannot tolerate portrayals of their object that they do not like - however well attested.
what does all this have to do with Putin or Russia?! I never even came close to those terms. I am still trying to figure out what your position is regarding "cold Fusion" please? Land grabs, errrrr what?
Are you actually accusing me of trying to shut 'dissenting" voices?! that would be amusing, since I am not part of the (or any) establishment and feel like our voice (believers that LENR is a real thing and science is not settled) is being censored pretty much everywhere, you know like papers not accepted, because if would violate the Copenhagen interpretation... which did happen to us when offering a paper on SAM, because it is not based on the Copenhagen Interpretation and neutrons are regarded as a fact (yes there is such a thing as the free-neutron, but not as a fundamental particle!), despite the large amount of evidence that the nuclear electron is a real thing and it works even better often than the concept of the neutron. In fact the book we wrote is basically a huge paper.
My simple problem with all this is that I feel mistreated by your writings often ( my perception) and feel like you are treating everyone here as one of your students that need some rectifying to the "settled science". Well Never going to happen, since I do not accept the Copenhagen Interpretation, neutron stars or heavy metals created by colliding neutron stars, nor the Big Bang, nor time travel and most certainly not a believer in dark matter or energy and last one, antimatter. All this is not needed to explain anything on a atomic or nuclear level. That is what I am trying to show others here on this forum. I try to do this via the Structured Atom Model and we wrote a whole book about this. I would ask you to at least try and read up on this, or watch the many video's and presentations about this. Perhaps there is something there worth discussing...
I can provide you with lots of additional information, but our book is most complete and thorough with lots of details and how this all works. In short, the structure of the nucleus as proposed in SAM is key to understanding all the physical and chemical attributes of atoms, meaning the nucleus organization is dictating for example the valence value, or how many isotopes can exist for an element, or what and how the neutron drip line comes into being, Or even the energy released by nuclear fission and on top of that why the fission of Uranium for example always breaks up in 2 different uneven chunks (elements).
There is so much more, but I think I made my point. It would be interesting to see you dive into this material and am serious about this,. please do look at our work and be critical and skeptical and all that. No problem, I think you will see that we are really not that far from mainstream science as you may perceive, despite me not accepting all the mentioned concepts. Norman Cook, pointed out in his book "models for Atomic Nuclei" how the current atomic models are all limited and as far as I know not one model ever provided an explanation for the uneven splitting of the nucleus. I think SAM does. but people like yourself should look at it first.
I am really trying to be polite and very honest here and try to stick to the topic at hand, and on top of that perhaps we can have some sensible debate about all this.
Should you be prepared to read up on this I will sent you the book personally in E format. This stuff is important! and I do not want this childish fighting.
Please can I ask you where you stand on the concept of LENR, meaning with a small input of energy we release the nuclear forces (energy)? Just provide me with a few sentences that would reflect your position, that would be handy to know.