A process (vacuum decay) that has just been experimentally verified to exist can cause transmutation (which has been shown to occur actioned by EVOs)
The EVO is a Exciton- Polariton Bose Einstein Condensate of a similar quantum mechanical modality as the condensate used in the referenced experiment. Research on these condensates are usually done using cold atomic atoms because producing polariton based condensates are hard to do and using these cold condensates make experimentally analyze easier.
Postulating the primacy and absoluteness of the movement of matter in our World leads to the conclusion that cold nuclear fusion is a method and form of movement of matter. Cold nuclear fusion always occurs during any movement of matter, and this can easily explain everything.
Then there is no need for the fantastic hypotheses of the Big Bang and the true and false vacuum.
As Paul Sutter explains, the universe was different early on as verified by the CERN collider. The forces that we now have were different early on, There is a loophole in nature where those early states of the universe can now be created inside the EVO.
The fantastic hypotheses that you fear is accepted by science and it underpins our understanding of nature.
The way the laws of physics works inside the EVO makes protons and neutrons impossible to exist. But the EVO is unstable and the EVO will terminate so that a plasma of quarks that had been produced inside the EVO will reform into new elements when the EVO is gone. This is what Aureon Energy has developed in their nuclear waste water remediation.stabilization product. Aureon does not mention fusion or fission. They say that do nuclear reorganization where heavy elements turn into light elements.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Quote from RobertBryant
The actual article is about NUCLEATION.. not nuclear transmutation Axil salad is confused and confusing.
On the contrary, the article is about the discovery of False Vacuum Decay in a Bose Einstein Condensate and a domain wall that protects the False Vacuum Decay decay mechanism.
False Vacuum Decay is a process that changes the laws of nature actioned by the nature of the ambient vacuum..
In quantum field theory, false vacuum decay is now an experimentally verified event where a vacuum that is relatively stable decays into a alternative state. This happens through the creation of small bubbles. Nucleation is the mechanism that forms the domain wall that creates the EVO bubble. The formation of a domain wall proves that the EVO contains a vacuum state that differs from that of the ambient vacuum.
We now understand that these small bubbles are EVOs forms through the creation of a domain wall the keeps the EVO vacuum state from mixing with the ambient vacuum state.
The ambient false vacuum is a vacuum that is metastable, meaning it is relatively stable but not in the most stable state. A false vacuum can last for a very long time, but it could eventually decay into a more stable state.
.
The idea of false vacuum decay is that the true lowest energy is lower than what we think. A false vacuum is at a local minimum of the energy function, while a true vacuum is at a global minimum.
The field structure inside the EVO makes the existence of composite particles such as the proton and the neutron impossible. When matter enters the EVO, matter decomposes into fundamental particles.
For a more detailed description of this transmutation process see this post:
Post
RE: The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.
Inside of an EVO, the state of the fields there do not permit protons and neutrons to exist. For example, the Higgs field is not present inside the EVO. Absorbed elements and their particles fall apart into their more fundamental constituents. When matter is absorbed into an EVO, that nuclear matter is broken apart into unpaired quarks and gluons called a quark gluon plasma (QGP). These particles accumulate, mix, concentrate, and are confined at the center of the EVO due to the reflection of…
Inside of an EVO, the state of the fields there do not permit protons and neutrons to exist. For example, the Higgs field is not present inside the EVO. Absorbed elements and their particles fall apart into their more fundamental constituents. When matter is absorbed into an EVO, that nuclear matter is broken apart into unpaired quarks and gluons called a quark gluon plasma (QGP). These particles accumulate, mix, concentrate, and are confined at the center of the EVO due to the reflection of these particles off the spherical domain walls of the EVO.
When the EVO terminates, this quark gluon plasma (QGP) freezes out back into protons, neutrons, and pions. Then these particles reform into various elements through hadronizing.
This quark gluon plasma freezeout process seems random based on the amount of material ingested by the EVO, the type of elements ingested, the lifetime of the EVO, and other variable factors associated with QGP processes.
Also gluon energy converts into hadrons during freezeout.
Quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is a state of matter that fills the universe for a few millionths of a second after the Big Bang. The plasma is a soup of quarks and gluons, which are elementary particles that bind together to form hadrons like protons and neutrons.
According to the Los Alamos National Laboratory, when the QGP cools down, it transforms into ordinary elementary particles when the QGP is once again exposed to ambient fields such as the Higgs.
In the Big Bang theory, quark–gluon plasma filled the entire Universe before matter as we know it was created. Theories predicting the existence of quark–gluon plasma were developed in the late 1970s and early 1980s.[3] Discussions around heavy ion experimentation followed suit[4][5][6][7][8] and the first experiment proposals were put forward at CERN[9][10][11][12][13][14] and BNL[15][16] in the following years. Quark–gluon plasma[17][18] was detected for the first time in the laboratory at CERN in the year 2000.[19][20][21]
Lots of evidence demonstrates that the application of laser light can stimulate a fusion reaction when the conditions are suitable. How the radiation interacts with the fusion process is still unknown.
Fusion and fission are not the only processes that can cause nuclear rearrangement.
A process that has just been experimentally verified to exist can cause transmutation. This process is called "false vacuum decay".
An experiment conducted in Italy, with theory support from Newcastle University, has produced the first experimental evidence of vacuum decay.
phys.org
This process has been associated with the discovery and validation of the Higgs field. It comes about when two separate states of the vacuum exist symaltainiously.
In quantum field theory, false vacuum decay is a hypothetical event that occurs when a relatively stable vacuum decays into a more stable state.
A false vacuum is a metastable state, meaning it's relatively stable but not the most stable state possible. It can last for a long time, but eventually it could decay into a more stable state. This decay happens through the creation of small bubbles. These bubbles might be what Exotic Vacuum Objects (EVO)s are.
The idea of false vacuum decay is that the true lowest energy is lower than what we currently think. A false vacuum is at a local minimum of the energy function, while a true vacuum is at a global minimum.
The EVO turns out to be a negative vacuum which is unstable. Because it is unstable, it will not destroy all matter, but it will rearrange the matter that it comes in contact with while the EVO exists for a short time.
There are a number of LENR systems engineered to use this nuclear reengagement property (aka transmutation) to do useful things. SAFIRE is a system that converts transuranic elements to lead. The Thor system "thunderstorm" uses EVOs to convert carbon to oxygen. Just because we see nuclear processes that appear to be caused by fusion and fission, does not mean that this old style processes are the cause.
Being unstable, keep in mind that the EVO will not destroy the universe, You can also check out this video:
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
When an EVO absorbs matter, that matter seems to disappear. Where does that matter go, and why is the EVO unstable? Why does an EVO eventually explode in a Bosenova? If the EVO was stable according to vacuum decay, it would keep eating matter until all the matter in our galaxy was inside the EVO. What causes the EVO to stop growing? The reason for all this strange behavior of the EVO is called "the instability conjecture". The AdS instability conjecture is a conjecture about the initial-boundary value problem in general relativity. It provides an example of weak turbulence appearing in the dynamics of the Einstein equations. The non-supersymmetric AdS instability conjecture can point to how quantum gravity removes the initial Big Bang. A proof of the instability of AdS for the Einstein-massless Vlasov system in spherical symmetry has been established. The numerical study of this conjecture in the simpler setting of the spherically symmetric Einstein-scalar field system was initiated by Bizón and Rostworowski. A rigorous proof of the AdS instability conjecture in the simplest possible setting has also been provided. A proof of the instability of AdS for the Einstein--null dust system with an inner mirror https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.08681.pdf An understandable explanation of the instability conjecture is found here: New Math Proves That a Special Kind of Space-Time Is Unstable https://www.quantamagazine.org…ime-is-unstable-20200511/ Einstein’s equations describe three canonical configurations of space-time. Now one of these three — important in the study of quantum gravity — has been shown to be inherently unstable. The proof involves injecting a small bit of matter into the space-time, akin to dropping a stone into a pond. Waves ripple out and back, interacting in a way that eventually creates a black hole.
Here’s the proof of instability: Moschidis showed that when he adds even a minuscule amount of matter to an AdS space-time, a black hole (or black holes) will inexorably form. However, AdS space-time has, by definition, uniform curvature everywhere, which means it cannot harbor space-contorting objects like black holes. “If you perturb AdS space-time and wait a sufficient time,” Moschidis said, “you’ll end up with a different geometry — one that contains black holes — and it’s no longer AdS. That’s what we mean by unstable.”
In a nutshell, the final result of the EVO lifecycle is the production of a micro sized black hole that causes the EVO to terminate. The next question is where do all these black holes go and why can't we detect them? It sounds like a WIMP to me.
This paper describes the experimental work done by Ferdinand Claude of the Kastler-Brossel Laboratory (LKB) of Sorbonne University, France to characterize the "ghost branch" of the dispersion of Exciton-polaritons. It is this photon field that can remove the virtual particles from the vacuum by using distrutive interference inside an EVO to make the EVO a negative energy structure (anti de-Sutter spacetime (AdS)).
The section of the article that highlights the mechanism for negative photon production as follows:
Quote
In a superfluid, the Bogoliubov dispersion relation has two branches, one with normal dispersion and one with negative dispersion, also known as the ghost branch. The latter branch owes its name to the fact that it is very challenging to excite—and thus to observe. The exquisite sensitivity of the pump-probe setup has previously allowed the LKB researchers to overcome this experimental difficulty and find traces of this ghost branch in reflectivity measures of their cavity
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
This video is invalid information. The EVO is a Bose Einstein Condensate (BEC) of Exciton-polaritons. The EVO is a coherent structure, whereas a plasmoid is not coherent. Two features of the EVO prove that the EVO is a BEC, first, the EVO has magnetic vortex flux tubes that extend out of the main body whereas the plasmoid does not have such tubes, next, as a supersolid, the EVO forms ideal shapes like triangles and hexagons whereas the plasmoid does not forms such shapes when impacting matter.
Another dark matter video about Jamie Farnes theory of negative mass cosmology. What the Farnes theory is missing is a negative energy/mass particle, but we have that in the EVO. The Farnes theory as follows: https://www.aanda.org/componen….1051/0004-6361/201832898
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
The EVO is the only system that might be generating negative energy, so it is reasonable to try to see if the EVO can meet all the requirements of negative mass cosmology. https://theconversation.com/bi…-research-suggests-107922 Some of the predictions of negative mass cosmology has been observed in resent observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) as described in this video:
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Dark energy is a dynamic thing that can change over time. So there must be some flexible mechanism that is producing Dark Energy as time goes by. The EVO is a possible multi phase source of dynamic dark matter/energy creation. By multi phase source, I mean that the EVO can be created in any number of ways, from production of EVOs in a hot plasma to the production of EVOs in the coldest temperatures in space. This flexible mode of EVO production makes the dynamic temperature dependent creation of dark matter/energy feasible. The Nobel prize winner Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, has defined what the dark matter/energy field is. He believes that it is a condensate of gluons which when applied to the EVO makes a good fit. Such an insight can make the inner workings of the EVO more visible to analysis. More details to come about how Ken Shoulders' beliefs about the EVO as the source of how dark matter and energy can find perches in current day science and cosmology in upcoming posts.
Cold nuclear fusion LENR occurred during the explosion of supernova SN1987A!!!
I am beginning to suspect that cold fusion underpins dark matter and dark energy. Wouldn't it be ironic if the "reputation trap" that keeps science away from cold fusion research is thwarting the discovery of what dark matter and energy is and how dark energy has been evolving.
The transition from a metastable state to the ground state in classical many-body systems is mediated by bubble nucleation. This transition has now been…
An experiment conducted in Italy, with theory support from Newcastle University, has produced the first experimental evidence of vacuum decay.
phys.org
This is what I have been trying to communicate about how the EVO executes the distruction of matter as follows:
Quote
Ian Moss, Professor of Theoretical Cosmology at Newcastle University's School of Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, said, "Vacuum decay is thought to play a central role in the creation of space, time and matter in the Big Bang, but until now there has been no experimental test. In particle physics, vacuum decay of the Higgs boson would alter the laws of physics, producing what has been described as the 'ultimate ecological catastrophe.'"
The EVO removes all quantum vacuum fluctuations from inside the spherical bubble by using the generation of negative energy photons that encompass its core within a domain wall. This bubble: the Domain wall is a very weird object that can keep two spacetimes separated while still allowing common items like photons and electrons to pass between, but matter is not allowed to pass until the Domain wall is destroyed.
Quote
This groundbreaking experiment is only the first step in exploring vacuum decay. The ultimate goal to is find vacuum decay at the temperature of absolute zero where the process is driven purely by quantum vacuum fluctuations.
In creating the EVO, we have performed this final step in duplicating the creation of the early universe except in reverse where we revert a bubble of spacetime(the EVO) to the way it was a slice of time (10^-40 of a second) that is smaller that a zeptosecond just after the big bang.
The smallest unit of time ever measured is the zeptosecond. A zeptosecond is a trillionth of a billionth of a second, or 10^−21 seconds. It is written as a decimal point followed by 20 zeroes and a 1 I am amazed that these experimenters have created a atomic Bose Einstein Condensate that could be made to produce an EVO like bubble using cold bosonic atoms.
I feel like you are throwing bait to me with your carbon cycle questions because I think you are not unaware that I have answered carbon cycle and related questions in various posts in this forum.
We will see if your hypothesis is consistent with reality when the SAFIRE waste water transmutation system comes on line. If the reaction produces energy in the transmutation of heavy unstable elements to lead and other elements, then the SAFIRE reactor should meltdown. The amount of elemental transmutation that will occur in that system will be huge and should produce outsized nuclear based energy over anything that that reactor can withstand. If that reactor does not melt down as I expect will happen, then you must go back and reformulate your thinking.
https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.174507 Spectrum of collective excitations of a quantum fluid of polaritons Abstract We use a recently developed high-resolution coherent probe spectroscopy method to investigate the dispersion of collective excitations of a polaritonic quantum fluid. We measure the dispersion relation with high energy and wave-number resolution, which allows to determine the speed of sound in the fluid and to evidence the contribution of an excitonic reservoir. We report on the generation of collective excitations at negative energies, on the ghost branch of the dispersion curve. Precursors of dynamical instabilities are also identified. Our methods open the way to the precise study of quantum hydrodynamics of quantum fluids of light. A Exciton polariton is a photon that is connected to an electron for just a few picoseconds (440 ps referenced in the paper). When that polariton terminates, that connection with the electron is broken and another polariton replaces it in the condensate when energy (pumping) is applied that actions the replacement of the terminated polariton. The condensate that requires input energy to maintain its aggregation of polaritons is called a non equilibrium condensate. When the polariton terminates, it produces light as its photon is released from the connection with the exciton (electron). The rate at witch these polaritons are replaced is called dispersion. From the referenced paper as follows: In this paper, we make use of this technique to perform a detailed study of the spectrum of collective excitations on both the normal and ghost branches, and we study the evolution of the Bogolioubov spectrum along the bistability loop of the fluid, as the pump parameters are scanned. The loss of polaritons via dispersion has two branches, a bright or normal branch and a "ghost" branch that serves to account for the negative energy based photons in the condensates photon aggregation. In Bogoliubov equation (9) that describes the dispersion of the condensate, there are two solutions, one for positive energy photons (bright) and one for negative energy photons (black). In the EVO, Ken Shoulders identifies two states of the EVO: a bright state and a black state. The EVO can transform itself from the bright state into the black state. This transformation is actions when the dispersion of the condensate moves from the normal branch to the ghost branch where negative energy transforms the EVO into another spacetime condition. The normal dispersion branch produces visible light, but the ghost branch of the dispersion produces a negative energy vacuum state that results in a new spacetime condition.
Experimental Concepts for Generating Negative Energy in
the Laboratory
This paper explains how negative energy can be used to produce science fiction like behavior if it could be controlled.
Abstract. Implementation of faster-than-light (FTL) interstellar travel via traversable wormholes, warp drives, or other spacetime modification schemes generally requires the engineering of spacetime into very specialized local geometries.
The analysis of these via Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity (GTR) field equations plus the resultant equations of state demonstrate that such geometries require the use of “exotic” matter in order to induce the requisite FTL spacetime modification. Exotic matter is generally defined by GTR physics to be matter that possesses (renormalized) negative energy density, and this is a very misunderstood and misapplied term by the non-GTR community. We clear up this misconception by defining what negative energy is, where it can be found in nature, and we also review the experimental concepts that have been proposed to generate negative energy in the laboratory.
One of the concepts contained in this paper that is useful in explaining how photonic engineering can be used to sequester negative vacuum energy is "Squeezed Light".
The vacuum is a roiling froth of virtual particles that contain both positive and negative energy components. These particles conform to the constraints of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
By squeezing light, it is possible to create an electric field that when applied to the vacuum will relieve the vacuum from the constraints imposed on the vacuum by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. If the vacuum is viewed as a wave tossed sea, it is possible to remove these waves by using a breakwater that greatly reduces or eliminates these waves. In the vacuum, applying the electric field produced by squeezed light, virtual particle production is reduced or eliminated. This modified state of the vacuum is a negative energy state.
The Casimir Effect is by far the easiest and most well known way to generate negative energy in the lab. The squeezed light process is equivalent to how two closely separated thin metal plates can produce a negative energy state in the vacuum by using the Casimir Effect .
The next post will explain how the EVO uses a self generated electric field from squeezed light to produce a negative vacuum energy state within its confining spherical bubble.
In a series of upcoming posts, I will explain how the EVO is a bubble of negative vacuum energy. This unusual space time state is the basis for many of the EVOs unworldly abilities. As a part of this explanation, I will describe how by using quantum mechanics (QM) that science can engineer the vacuum using QM methods to produce negative vacuum energy, and then explain how the EVO self separates vacuum energy into sequestered positive and negative energy.
Contrary to common beliefs, the EVO is essentially a bubble of sequestrated light. As such, the photon can be engineered to express its negative energy components. In explanation, a light wave is a mixture of both positive and negative energy components.
When describing the propagation of light, equations require that the light field be described as having both positive and negative frequencies. A negative frequency indicates a wave made up of photons that have negative energy.
Negative frequencies are a mathematical construct that allows for the analysis of real signals using a complex number framework. A single sine wave can be broken down into two complex exponentials, one with a positive exponent and one with a negative exponent. The negative exponent is where the concept of a negative frequency comes from.
Negative frequencies can also be thought of as a rotation in the opposite direction. For example, a wheel rotating counter-clockwise at one revolution per second has a frequency of rotation of 1 Hz. If it rotates clockwise, its frequency of rotation is -1 Hz.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
The impact of something we thought couldn't exist has now been detected.
arstechnica.com
According to Ars Technica, a negative frequency in light indicates a wave made up of photons with negative energy. However, negative energy is a concept used in physics to explain the nature of certain fields, including the gravitational field and various quantum field effects.
Negative frequencies are a mathematical construct that allows for the analysis of real signals using a complex number framework. A complex number can only be made real if its conjugate is added to it.
Frequency is defined as the number of cycles per second. A clockwise cycle results in a positive frequency, while a counterclockwise cycle results in a negative frequency.
The next post will explain how QM can be used to extract the negative energy component of light to form a bubble of negative energy in the vacuum.
This chart approximates the fuel consumption of a natural gas generator based on the size and load at which the generator is operating at
www.generatorsource.com
The Thor system has operated on a 400KW electrical generator for 8 years and the Thor stainless steel carbon to oxygen converter has not melted down in all that time.
If the reaction that converts carbon to oxygen produced any energy, one would expect even with a modest production of energy from transmutation, the Thor convertor would have melted down by now having experienced a gas flow 5132 cu feet/hour at some points. That amount of gas flow represents a huge amount of carbon throughput. But upon recent inspection of that convertor, outside of some corrosion effects on some surfaces, the stainless steel remains like new.
Whatever is transmuting carbon to oxygen is not producing any energy inside the convertor... none. Consistent with this observation, how could the Thor system be classified as a LENR system? Please explain this contradiction.
Because the TG does bot have the same internal environment as a carbon star perhaps?
By the same logic, because the LENR systems on earth don't have the same nuclear environment as occurs in the core of the Sun therefore protium fusion is not possible on earth.
Protium, the most common isotope of hydrogen, cannot easily start a fusion
process on its own. This is because it requires extremely high temperatures and pressures to overcome the electrostatic repulsion between positively charged nuclei.
Fusion is difficult because atoms have a positive charge and repel each other without electrons. The fusion process must use extreme temperatures and pressures to overcome the forces that naturally want to repel the atoms.
On Earth, scientists don't have the kind of pressure needed for fusion to take place. They need to hit temperatures even hotter than the Sun to get the same reaction. To replicate that process of fusion here on Earth, we would need a temperature of at least 100 million degrees Celsius, or about six times hotter than the sun.
It has long been suspected that a protium fusion is more difficult to achieve than that of the heavier isotopes of hydrogen. This is because the larger masses automatically have larger dimensions and will, therefore, be easier to get closer to each other.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.More DetailsClose
