More pipi. Did you notice you checked age 60?
You did not specify under-60. Ovwer-60 is the default.
Now: this folks is actually make subtle and clever than typical antivaxxer memes, although just as misleading.
W took the only graph he could find that seemed strange and cropped it to make the strangeness difficult to explain. And posted it.
Let us look at that severe ill graph,
If you select: per 100K/ over 60 you get what I posted - which is what you expect. W knows that, so he won't post it.
Under-60, you get something a bit like what W posted but note not the same.
- Now look at severe patients - new. This shows for each week how many new patients in each category were admitted to ICU. You can see it is 1 or 0, and random. The "very concerning" trend is a statistical blip.
- Notice also, for all of these graphs, that boostered >> two dose vaccinated >> unvaccinated
- Finally notice you DO gte anomalies in these graphs whenever Israel decides that certain ages need more doses to be fully vaccinated, which move people from dark green to light green graph.
This is copying antivaxxer behaviour at a more fundamental level. W is sifting uncritically through data till he finds something that looks bad for Pfizer vaccines, and then latches onto it without any curiosity or ability to research it further. It is a real lack in his process here.
If you select under 50 there are so few people (for the boostered and vaccinated graphs) that the quantisation makes a one person increase look like X4.
To see that
(1) 0 booster patients