And you are a circuit jocky who thinks he is smarter and more informed than all. They do research, you do character assignations. You knew nothing of seneff before the pandemic and now you are an expert on her research. You are so see thru
This is a misunderstanding. Unlike many here I admit to NOT being an expert on immunology.
As such, I can recognise any fellow Computer Scientists who unlike me pretend to be that.
You see, the beauty of the THH anti-vaxxer detection kit is that it does not require any evaluation of the science.
Anti-vaxxers such as Seneff betray themselves by pontificating as experts on such a very wide range of disparate fields - with only the anti-vaxxer slant as common theme - that no sensible person who did their journalistic research would take them seriously. In addition they pontificate on fields wildly different from any training they have had (in this case Seneff is a Computer Scientist).
You have continually misunderstood this about me. I have never claimed to be more expert than these clowns - or even as expert as they are.
However it is clear that they are much less expert than they claim to be, and also much less expert than the many real experts who disagree with them. Therefore I cannot take them seriously.
There is a well-known here equivalent. One reason many of us realised Rossi was a flake long ago is that if you believe him he must be an expert in some many different areas. One serendipitous world-shaking breakthrough - sure. But 5 - all in different areas of technology and science? It seems unlikely.