QuoteI wouldn't go far on final judging Rossi before Court ruling and before he shows what he possibly has to show since his story is still plausible.
No. Nobody, no matter how gullible, who has an ounce of scientific education and good sense can look at the *longitudinal* history of Rossi's scam *and* his background of the previous twenty years and come away with that conclusion. There is NO credible scenario in which Rossi's original ecats did what he said they did and in which he would not, by now, more than six years later, have an accepted and immensely profitable technology. Instead, he has only lies (starting in 2011) about customers, no truly independent and credible testing, his only sponsor disowned him and wants their money back, and he is embroiled in a completely idiotic but very expensive law suit which he can not win, against a large financial entity and one of the country's most prestigious law firms. You think that is compatible with the ecats actually working as Rossi claims or at all? WHY?