How can a difference between a control and a test which clearly demonstrates a positive XSH effect in the test be ignored at all? To do so is irrational on your part, ...
I didn't say that difference between a control and a test are to be ignored, I said quite the opposite. Read my post of a few hours ago. I wrote: "The comparison between the behaviors of cells filled with different electrolytes or featuring cathodes made of different material is very important."
I only stressed that this difference is meaningless with respect to the conclusions contained in the 1992 F&P paper, which describes an experiment with no control test.
… but i understand your reluctance to accept the notion that you are wrong.
This a very common weakness of the human nature. Let's the readers decide who is affected by it in this case.
And BTW this is clearly off topic, and very shortly this post, your post and other related OT posts will be moved to clearance.
I've just answered all the replies to my first comment (1) posted in the thread dedicated to the 3000th member of this LENR-forum, which is the most important site worldwide where people can discuss about CF, a phenomenon claimed almost 30 years ago by F&P. So it seems to me that all those posts where in topic.
Anyway, could you please indicate where is it possible for the L-F members to discuss about the two founders of CF and their experiments?