He speaks in gibberish
Mahatma Gandhi: “At first they don’t notice you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you. And then you win"
EMDrive: Newton's Laws can be "bypassed"?
-
-
Le Kazah Gandhi Nikitin ahahhahhahhaahhahahahahahahhahahaha
So according to daily pictures of your friend Tarasenko you are living in a country with so many rocks.. So take care because Gandhi received so many of them by his detractors...
Mahatma Gandhi : « Au début, ils ne vous remarquent pas, puis ils se moquent de vous, puis ils vous combattent. Et puis tu gagnes"
-
Le Kazah Gandhi Nikitin ahahhahhahhaahhahahahahahahhahahaha
So according to daily pictures of your friend Tarasenko you are living in a country with so many rocks.. So take care because Gandhi received so many of them by his detractors...
“You will never discover the secret of cold fusion if you stop and throw stones at every barking dog.”
Winston Churchill
-
Sad for you but.... Already done
“You will never discover the secret of cold fusion if you stop and throw stones at every barking dog.”
Winston Churchill
-
Mahatma Gandhi: “At first they don’t notice you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you. And then you win"
What will you win? Crackpot of the Year Award?
-
I understood that the light in the beams rotates along closed trajectories, but moves in a straight line and at the speed of light. By the way, a tensor-type vortex has the symmetry of a sphere with gouged poles, and this is the group U(2).
Photons are wave packets in essence, but every wave comes with its torsion part, as Maxwell recognized in his original version of EM theory, which involved displacement currents. During transient events (i.e. pulses) the torsion aspects of EM wave becomes dominant in similar way, like vibrating membrane generates waves, but pulsing membrane releases vortex rings into an outside. Tesla observed his scalar waves (EVO's ) first when he managed to interrupt current in his coils sufficiently fast with magnetic interrupter. Modern Tesla transformers trying to immitate Tesla coil with high frequency solid state oscillators are Cargo cult science, as they missed the scalar aspect of original Tesla design.
-
Quote
By the way, a tensor-type vortex has the symmetry of a sphere with gouged poles, and this is the group U(2).
They're vortex rings composed of vortex rings, recursively.. Within fluids this arrangement is known as so called Windall's instability.
-
Always i have had difficulties to imagine what was scalar waves ? Could you share more deep explantion for a novice in this way ? Again could you tell more about the Tesla experiment which interruptud quickly the current ?
Photons are wave packets in essence, but every wave comes with its torsion part, as Maxwell recognized in his original version of EM theory, which involved displacement currents. During transient events (i.e. pulses) the torsion aspects of EM wave becomes dominant in similar way, like vibrating membrane generates waves, but pulsing membrane releases vortex rings into an outside. Tesla observed his scalar waves (EVO's ) first when he managed to interrupt current in his coils sufficiently fast with magnetic interrupter. Modern Tesla transformers trying to immitate Tesla coil with high frequency solid state oscillators are Cargo cult science, as they missed the scalar aspect of original Tesla design.
-
What will you win? Crackpot of the Year Award?
Are you on the jury for this Award?!
-
Are you on the jury for this Award?!
Trial not needed. People just read your paper and they can decide.
I bet if you read your own work close enough you would realize it is gibberish.
It is not really saying anything coherent so one can't debunk it as a whole because there is no whole.
You can just point to many inconsistencies (for example failed dimensional analysis in your equalities.)
May I ask your educational background, as an "independent theoretical physicist"?
What do you professors think about your work?
I'm not trying to be mean but crackpot writings on LF do a disservice to the acceptance of LENR.
-
I'm not trying to be mean but crackpot writings on LF do a disservice to the acceptance of LENR.
We are all crackpots t some degree. But have better manners than to mention it.
-
We are all crackpots t some degree.
It doesn't matter if the pot is cracked, but rather if it will hold water.
-
Vortexes in liquids and gases or in plasma are one thing, but vortices in an electromagnetic field are another. Moreover, the second requires justification. It was not for nothing that I pointed out to you that a tensor-type vortex has the symmetry of a unitary group, which is responsible for the gauge symmetries of the electron. Most likely, the tensor type vortex is localized in the electron space.
-
what was scalar waves ? Could you share more deep explantion
There are two main types of waves: transverse and longitudinal. On water surface we also have transverse surface waves, i.e. surface ripples which undulate perpendicularly to direction of propagation. And longitudinal waves, which are pressure waves of the underwater and they compress water in the direction in which they propagate. In dense aether model the scalar waves of Nicola Tesla denote longitudinal waves of the vacuum, whereas transverse waves are common light waves in essence. Mainstream physics is centered about transverse wave model - being symmetric to transverse waves the scalar waves comprise the whole half of physics, which scientists still ignore.
Dense aether model models space-time with water surface analogy: the directions parallel with surface are spatial dimensions, the remaining direction perpendicular to it is temporal dimension. Water surface is thus miniature 3D model of 4D space-time in dense aether model. Transverse waves apparently follow temporal dimension and they don't propagate through it, which is why we are saying that for photons time stops. Being hyperdimensional, scalar waves actually don't care about time dimension of space-time and they can propagate across it.
At the water surface the underwater sound waves propagate much faster than surface ripples, similarly scalar waves are at least 10.000-times faster than the speed of light and Lorentz invariance doesn't apply to them. But sound waves don't actually propagate like ripples at the water surface: they manifest itself there like less or more random noise. Similarly to water surface, scalar waves manifest itself like so-called quantum noise in the vacuum, or so-called Zero point energy. When we put small particles into water, they start to wiggle due to underwater noise which is called the Brownian noise. Atoms in vacuum behave similarly, they wiggle even when being cooled to absolute zero temperature and this is manifestation of scalar waves of vacuum, i.e. tiny pressure changes in vacuum density.
Similarly to sound waves at water surface, the scalar waves can not be traced by its source easily. When sound wave hits some place at the water surface then the amplitude of noise suddenly increases at this place. This can be observed most easily during underwater nuclear detonations. Similarly when scalar waves hit some place of vacuum, it can be detected by change of quantum noise at this place without apparent source and/or direction.
-
It's important to realize, that transverse and longitudinal waves never come in pure form at the water surface just because of omnipresent Brownian noise. When transverse ripples interact with it, they do form wave packets, known as a Russel solitons at the water surface. In vacuum we are calling these solitons a photons. The photon is thus result of mutual interaction of idealized transverse Maxwell wave of vacuum with quantum background formed with scalar waves. Every photon therefore has its scalar part, which is represented by motion of EM wave in direction different from direction of its propagation.
-
Display More
Trial not needed. People just read your paper and they can decide.
I bet if you read your own work close enough you would realize it is gibberish.
It is not really saying anything coherent so one can't debunk it as a whole because there is no whole.
You can just point to many inconsistencies (for example failed dimensional analysis in your equalities.)
May I ask your educational background, as an "independent theoretical physicist"?
What do you professors think about your work?
I'm not trying to be mean but crackpot writings on LF do a disservice to the acceptance of LENR.
Take off the judge's robe (it's too big for you. Judge-Time) and say something substantive.
-
This theory doesn't care how many times the photons bounce from walls, only few bounces are needed for to suffice some thrust. The more bounces, the better energy efficiency indeed.
But only conical side provides the Brewster angle, polarization and spin during bouncing. The thrust is generated by conical shape, not by flat walls of EMDrive and the polarization of photons occurs during their bouncing which happens in one direction only. Bouncing of photons from flat side doesn't generate thrust, the ratio of flat sides area thus doesn't matter in this model.
But microwave resonators can also be cylindrical, which means a distorted one can be conical. Anyway, you fell into Shawyer's photon trap. There really are no photon's in his device as the properties of microwave resonators satisfies Maxwell's Equations very well. While you can consider photon's, if you wish, they must behave in a way consistent with the behavior of the E M fiekds.
-
There really are no photon's in his device as the properties of microwave resonators satisfies Maxwell's Equations very well
Lets talk about EM wave, then. EM wave can be polarized by reflection in the same way like photons. Actually Shawyer borrowed his idea from earlier work of Cullen, who derived it just for microwaves. EMDrive is based on seventy years old observation, that polarized electromagnetic waves exert reactive force when bouncing from conical cavity under Brewster angle. Cullen even proposed this effect for direct measurement of microwave power in waveguides. In 1902 Nichols and Hull have verified the Maxwell Bartoli theory of radiation pressure experimentally to within 1-2 per cent by a torsion balance method, with a light beam carrying a power of about 0.1 watt.
-
Everyone is looking for a new “eternal” fuel-free engine based on new physical principles.
There is such an engine! But only in one single copy. Its power is an absolute invariant and is equal to Planck’s constant divided by Planck’s time. This is our World!
Look out the window: Everything moves and changes. For example, the full Moon moves around the Earth. So what, the Moon has an engine? Eat! She herself is the engine - the generator of cold nuclear fusion!
-
So, solve the problem using E M waves. Personally, I think the effect, if it exists, is due to uneven heating and the emission of infrared photons, which carry away momentum. The distortion then induces patterns in that radiation similar to the effect of heating from the sun that makes near earth asteroid orbits so problematical.
