Regarding John Dash requested the removal of reference... Sample contamination is the declaimer that is almost always used to discredit transmutation activity via the LENR reaction.
And those who have done many hundreds or thousands of sample analyses will see the wisdom in that.
Axil is suggesting that all LENR reactions are caused by EVOs. There is no evidence for that, but it doesn't mean that some LENR isn't caused by EVOs.but by other mechanisms, including electromigration and electron screening. To dismiss the possibility that there is no other mechanism than the EVO is not scientific or sensible.
Worst an EVO is a mythical object. Axil then goes on to surround the myth with more misinterpreted references to scientific reports. He claims authority by reference to thing he claims that only he understands. He points to the right phenomenon, then does everything possible to perverts its understanding.
The phenomenon root is attraction of like charges also known as a charge cluster. Math and factual evidence support charge clusters causing a gravitational force which is about 42 orders of magnitude stronger than universal gravity. That force causes a distribution of energy which in non- thermal. That means "Lawson criterion" does not apply for fusion caused by charge clusters: it is not thermal plasma based. Rather as with any gravity based planetoid, the escape velocity governs the highest energies of objects which leave and hence interact with objects exterior to the planetoid.
The velocities of particles from charge cluster's which cause fusion are in the MeV energies as shown by data fit to the phat equation which data was produced by Ed Storms. This is Ed's amazing result: fusion range energies from low energy inputs. The correlation to a phat equation is highly significant. There is no magic or low energy nuclear reaction. Fusion occurs because the kinetic energy is sufficient to overcome the Columbic barrier between atomic nuclei and gravity keeps most of the kinetic energy of the nuclear process confined to the planetoid.
The strange part is what causes this second form of gravity what Matsumoto called electronuclear gravity. Axil corrects connects electronuclear gravity with boson condensates but quickly leads that concept to wilds distractions from real math. The math indicates a fit to the Phat equation of Pharsis Williams. Phat equations relate the frequencies of light that condense and the frequencies to which they condense. The MeV energies which overcome the coulomb barrier are related to ionization frequency of hydrogen, E = n2 (~13.6 eV). The quantum number n in a condensate is the unit number of the condensate. As the quantum number gets larger so the size of the planetoid gets exponentially larger. Since voltage is force per unit charge as the number of electrons repelling each other gets larger the voltage of a kinetic particle at the escape horizon gets larger. Hence, a large enough charge cluster expels negatively charged particles with voltage sufficient to cause nuclear fusion. Some of these electrons expelled from EVOs were used by Ken Shoulder to create pictures of EVOs. However, the particles that Ed detected lose the negative charge and were high voltage cations. Further, what is the origin of this new type of gravitational force?
The equation for electro-gravity is derived by a balance on an electron at the escape horizon. The attractive force of electro-gravity holds the electron in orbit but the repulsive force of a negatively charged cluster (planetoid) of electrons repels the electron at the escape horizon. For the purpose of the derivation, the particles which comprise the planetoid have the same mass and charge as electrons but are a composite particle which is a boson rather than a fermion. Axil has agreed with this elsewhere but goes on with distraction about types such particles, Higgs particles and strange field effects.
The only field effect one needs to understand is that the particle that attaches itself to the electron which causes the electron to become a boson, that particle is attached like a string to the electron. As energy is added to this string system the nearly massless particle is accelerated relative to the electron. Think of it as extending a warp field over a spaceship. The relative velocity of the free end (the new particle end) of the string is related by the Lorentz factor to speed of light. Hence, the local effects on time dilation, length contraction and relative mass affect the mass of the particle attached to the electron, the length of the string and rate of time that passes for the string. These quantities are defined by the scalar value of the Lorentz factor. This is the origin of the gravitational field, and the effect is quantum, one particle at a time. Hence, the field is quantum; it grows as each pseudoparticle (string attached to an electron) is added to the planetoid.
One uses the above balance rearranges the equation and solves for the value of the "electro-gravitational" constant. If you took the time to do the derivation or to look it up elsewhere in this forum you found its value is Gre = kqe2/me2. Where k is Coulomb's constant, qe is the charge of an electron and me is the mass of an electron. Gre is a gravitational constant to due special relativity of some unknown particle locked in orbit of an electron which effect extends a gravitational field particularly to pseudoparticle's encompassed by the same unknown particle. Since, we have the value above, we compare that to universal gravity and find that electro-gravity is about 42 orders of magnitude stronger than universal gravity. Such a strong gravitational force, if applied to the neutron (assumes the neutron to be a pseudoparticle composed of an electron, proton etc.) would lead to clusters of pseudoneutrons that would be neutron stars which neutron stars could become blackholes.
Scientists apply predictions and look for data. Fools reject out right ideas which to them seem ridiculous without further considerations. We have scientists in this forum who consider a structured model of the atomic nucleus whose ideas have been rejected outright. T. Matsumoto considered a fusion model where the atomic nucleus could be modified to a "fermented" form. The nucleus would convert to an itonic form where the core was pseudo-neutrons (he said neutrons, I add pseudo) and the core is surrounded by a net-like structure of positrons and electrons. (This nuclear structure is consistent with both that of "W" and of "E" from this forum). Matsumoto observed and measured with photographs radiation which has only been observed with cold fusion. He called some images produced by radiation blackholes. Such an observation would be consistent with the mathematical mechanism proposed for non-thermal nuclear fusion above.
The usual form of the Schwartzchild equation is Rs =2GM/c2. G is the universal gravity constant, M the mass of blackhole and c is the speed of light. For the pseudo-neutron cluster under the effects of electro-gravity a proton is added to the boson string of an electron and the unknown particle. Hence, the Schwartzchild radius is approximately 2Gre(n((2(electron masses) + (proton mass)) where n is the number of pseudo-neutrons. Or more simply stated the measured diameters of images which Matsumoto called blackholes should be as integers since pseudoneutrons occur in whole numbers in atomic nuclei. One can make the measurements on Matsumoto's images or look up the results of my analysis in this forum. The sizes of the images correlated 99.9% with integer values. Isn't that an amazing prediction!
What is suggested is that "Matsumoto" blackholes are radiated from electro-gravity based planetoids. Axil would distract you from the reality of fusion at the event horizon of an electro-gravity based planetoid by following blackholes and whiteholes. Bob Greenyer and others would lead one to follow mystic number theory. I have shown by mass balance and stoichiometry that transmutation equations can be derived which have an accountability for nucleons in a balance reaction equation of 99.9%. For a material scientist's this is an amazing result.
As scientists I think you should find the correlation between "Matsumoto" blackholes and what we suppose we know of the blackholes observed through telescopes to be worth considering. The Schwartzchild equation expresses the limit of speed at which shear between any two particles of matter of the standard model shred each other into an unknown fundamental mass. Falsely it is assumed that a blackhole radiates out of existence via Hawking radiation. It does radiate out of existence. But, if one uses the above view of shear to a fundamental, then one can find a fundamental unknown mass which is the rest mass which attaches itself to make a boson string of an electron. One can then rearrange the equation to create a definition of the Universal gravity constant which is in form like the arrangement of fundamental constant that is the electro-gravitational constant. Hence, gravity is a result of mass and charges of a yet unknown but very definable majorana particle(s) which is the fundamental(s) of every other particle which could occur in the standard model. A quantum form of universal gravity is like the quantum form of electro-gravity and can be defined on this basis.
Matsumoto blackholes are radiated from a reaction, become trapped by a charge difference at a film interface and the shear between fundamentals causes the blackholes to radiate these fundamentals which fundamentals interact with pixels of the film to develop an image from the blackhole which is acting as if it were a light source. The electric field of film interface polarizes the blackhole. Mass escaping at an escape horizon of the blackhole come off tangentially. The path is an expectation of gravity on path of a mass escaping a planet. Hence, a blackhole hopping along the interface creates an image of a ring in motion. If the blackhole remain immobilized at the interface a succession of smaller and smaller rings within rings develops in the image until the image of blackspot develops. If the film is all the same thickness and composition, each blackhole is immobilized at a fixed distance relative to image in the film. Hence, the quantum relationship between image sizes and blackhole masses. These are amazing verifiable facts in Matsumoto's presentations. I challenge any of you to provide a better theory to explain these shapes and images but do provide the math.
I think there exists very little wiggle room for a better explanation what we call LENR reactions in this forum.
How do I summarize the expectation for charge cluster catalyzed fusion? One needs energies sufficient to ionize hydrogen. Most reactions can be traced to E = n2 (~hv) where ~hv is 13.6 eV. A boson condensate which is a string between an electron and an unknown particle creates electrogravity which leads to energies at the escape horizon of an electrical negative planetoid which are sufficient to overcome the coulombic barrier to fusion between atoms. The most common initial fusion product in a watery environment is oxygen-17. Fusion will produce free energy. But the Gibbs free energy equation has a heat term and an entropy term. For charge cluster catalyzed fusion, the production of large amounts of some fundamental mass(es) reduce(s)s
heat production relative to entropy production. Look to the characterization by Rout et al for description of this fundamental stuff. Matter to antimatter balance requires that it be possible to destabilize the fundamental(s) produced by charge cluster catalyzed fusion to produce kinetic energy. I don't know how to do that but some poorly defined interaction with electric and magnetic field appears to be the solution. In the LEC the fundamental(s) is/are converted to electric field energy as if they are electrochemical. There are blackholes produced by charge cluster catalyzed fusion but expect them to be short lived. Another key is that the fundamental that comes out of charge cluster catalyzed fusion can be converted to a light source. The fundamental is like entropy that comes from any other entropy producing reaction or like the dark energy produced by celestial blackholes.
Focusing on converting the fundamentals radiating from charge cluster catalyzed fusion as an energy source is the most likely way to create a new energy source. For example, the LEC is a promising approach. For example, creating a dense light or heat source light Brillant light energy is a promising approach.
Focusing on minimizing the size of charge clusters is good approach since there would be fewer blackholes compared to useful electrochemical fuel produced by fusion. Maximizing the production of fuel is a good approach.
Worst an EVO is a mythical object. Axil then goes on to surround the myth with more misinterpreted references to scientific reports. He claims authority by reference to thing he claims that only he understands. He points to the right phenomenon, then does everything possible to perverts its understanding.
He then insults anyone who calls out his word salad as the gibberish it is, and posts pages and pages of garbage to obfuscate any possible argument. I think Axil is a mythical object. Perhaps the Loch Mess Monster, or a Chimera (half bull, half dung beetle)
gibberish
EVO..=
. Entertainment Value Only
maybe there is an EVO scale...1-10
Worst an EVO is a mythical object. Axil then goes on to surround the myth with more misinterpreted references to scientific reports. He claims authority by reference to thing he claims that only he understands. He points to the right phenomenon, then does everything possible to perverts its understanding....
Thanks for your long and thoughtful post.
The LENR reaction may be producing a significant number of new types of subatomic particles. But one might ask, "why haven't CERN already discovered these new particles yet".
The CERN particle collider runs under the field structure of our current universe. CERN never found any evidence of any particles associated with long range weak force causation. In the standard model, the weak force only occurs under unstable particle activation. The unstable particle always causes the weak force to manifest. But these new EVO based particles can force the unstable particle to stabilize.
But inside the EVO, there are other alien field structures that may be occurring. The force carrying particles produced inside the EVO may create fields that are not possible to produce inside our universe yet are still acting inside the universe. The EVO is required to produce these alien particles.
For example, the magnetic fields produced by the EVO may differ from the magnetic fields produced in our universe. These alien EVO fields may stabilize isotopes or produce transmutation.
The tracks seen in strange radiation may be formed from the action produced by the magnetic vortex flux tubes originating inside the EVO.
It has been found that variations in the sun and other processes in cosmic space cause isotope half-lives to vary on earth. These variations may be produced by particles produced by EVOs inside the sun and in outer space.
Quotehttps://www.purdue.edu/news....Display More
Purdue-Stanford team finds radioactive decay rates vary with the sun's rotation
A team of scientists from Purdue and Stanford universities has found that the decay of radioactive isotopes fluctuates in synch with the rotation of the sun's core.
The fluctuations appear to be very small but could lead to predictive tools for solar flares and may have an impact on medical radiation treatments.
This adds to evidence of swings in decay rates in response to solar activity and the distance between the Earth and the sun that Purdue researchers Ephraim Fischbach, a professor of physics, and Jere Jenkins, a nuclear engineer, have been gathering for the last four years. The Purdue team previously reported observing a drop in the rate of decay that began a day and half before and peaked during the December 2006 solar flare and an annual fluctuation that appeared to be based on the Earth's orbit of, and changing distance from, the sun, Jenkins said.
The Bose Einstein Condensate produces a north and south polarized magnetic flux tubes. As a BEC, the EVO also produces these tubes.
There tubes drill pairs of holes into the surface that the EVO lies on. one hole for each flux tube.
We have seen these magnetic north and south flux tubes that project out of the EVO drill holes into surfaces as well as carry transmuted matter inside them (the "cannon" in the LION reactor and other instances and systems), This means that the particles produced inside the EVO are both electroweak force carriers and transmutation active. These particles act instantaneously to affect matter. This means that the fields inside the EVO are alien unlike what we experience everyday. But these alien fields can only be created inside the EVO but can have affects in our universe.
In this video, an EVO is imbedded in a wire and its two flux tubes project out of the EVO onto the surface and disrupt the that surface at a distance.
Strange radiation tracts are another example of how these flux tubes produce transmutation effects. As the EVO fly's over a surface, these tubes cut into it and transmute matter. Transmutation has nothing to due with gravity in this instance, it is modified magnetism.
In this video, an EVO is moving over a surface while rotating. As it goes it dills holes in that surface using its flux tubes.
The LENR reaction can not only generate energy, it is far more consequential and impactful to society into the future than currently assumed by the LENR community.
.
If the EVO is producing the LENR reaction OUTSIDE of the EVO, then it must be generating a LENR force carrying particle
We don't need any more particles.
then it must be generating a LENR force carrying particle
I recommend our Axilles (a well known Greek hero) the common standard model (SM) terminology termination therapy what is watching all Monty Python movies ...
A particle can never carry a force. This idea was once invented by a SM madhouse inhabitant that after drinking 10 bottles of Vodka created the Gluon "particle" when looking at his vomiting.
What all experiments tell is that separated particles feel a force and this force disappears e.g. when two e/p join. It reoccurs when you add energy. Forces cannot exist at their own and are always in relation to something other that must produce the same or opposite force.
Some freaks also did deepen the gluon idea to invent a new color force, what simple people believe to see when admiring a nice flower...
LENR force
10 on the EVO scale... May the LENR force be with all of us....always
HNY
By using a exciton polariton condensate, at system can be created that has a negative spacetime curvature. This type of system which acts as an analog universe is what an EVO is.
New Year, same ol' BS
https://arstechnica.com/scienc…0large%20scales.%E2%80%9D
By using a exciton polariton condensate, at system can be created that has a negative spacetime curvature. This type of system which acts as an analog universe is what an EVO is.
A charge cluster is a boson condensate but electrogravity is 42 orders of magnitude stronger than universal gravity. Nevertheless, a Matsumoto blackhole which is composed of a few "neutron star type" neutrons should produce the same kind of blackhole as from a celestially observable blackhole. That is to say that as a celestially observable blackhole get older, it gets more like a Matsumoto blackhole. The final pathway to complete evaporation should be the same. The massive radiation from a Matsumoto blackhole should be the same as the dark energy from old celestial blackholes. Hence, one predicts that the celestrial blackhole appears more massive without accretion because the coupling constants become more electrogravity and less universal gravity.
Taking the same two constant gravity model, one predicts that "dark matter" is matter attracted by electrogravity more than universal gravity. If so, then the actual amount of dark mass is orders of magnitude smaller than current predicts which use only the universal gravitational constant. Observations by electric universe support this contention.
I see no need for negative spacetime curvature.
a Matsumoto blackhole which is composed of a few "neutron star type" neutrons should produce the same kind of blackhole as from a celestially observable blackhole.
Such terminology is nonsense. Atoms nuclei , alpha particle have about the same density as a black hole. But a black hole is defined by its g-force = nuclear or at least EM force.
Such terminology is nonsense. Atoms nuclei , alpha particle have about the same density as a black hole. But a black hole is defined by its g-force = nuclear or at least EM force.
I have provided a derivation for the electrogravitational constant which is 42 orders of magnitude stronger than universal gravity. I have shown by correlation that Masumoto blackholes are produced from nucleon units. The images called blackholes by Masumoto are composed of many pixels. These pixels are mathematically tied to a gravitational horizon escape path of massive particles. Hence, "pseudo-neutrons" once they have lost their itonic net which Masumoto has also observed, will disintegrate into a large number of massive particles much smaller in mass than "pseudo-neutrons." I use the term pseudo-neutrons since we both know that neutrons do not decay in this manner. The suggestion of Matsumoto is that "electronuclear gravity" ferments (reorganizes units within a nucleus). It is possible to modify the equation for the Schwartzchild radius with the assumption of a universal fundamental particle to define the universal gravitational constant as a combination of the coulomb constant and ratio of the square of charge to square of mass of a universal fundamental particle. Hence, it is consistent to view a cluster of "pseudo-neutrons" as a remnant of a neutron star, aka blackhole. In which case Masumoto images of blackholes would be created by stretch and squeeze effects caused by the coherent radiation of universal fundamental particles aka gravitational waves.
The suggestion of Matsumoto is that "electronuclear gravity" ferments (reorganizes units within a nucleus). It is possible to modify the equation for the Schwartzchild radius
The metric for nuclear fores is totally different from the GR metric as it does not retain linearity and in fact is contracting - what it must be! So Schwarzschild is completely wrong.
SOP can exactly give the nuclear structure and the energy content of an alpha wave energy compression. You can control this by looking at the range of the gamma spectrum of a nucleus.
Even heuristically it is easy to see that e.g. Nickel + H*-H* fusion cannot result in stable products and it is very likely that the chain gets extended like
Ni-H*-H*-Ni what leads to equilibrium state fragments that almost all so far doing MS did report. In such reactions the second (more energetic) alpha wave joins and decays into the most stable fragments what rearranges the nucleus. Alpha waves follow the magic 7/9 torus inertia law what means that chains of e.g. of n*7 alphas are most stable (like 28Si, or 56Fe)
As I mentioned some pages ago. 21-Ne is the first element with a stable alpha wave. You can see this when the gamma spectrum extends well above 8.5 MeV and is not fragmenting (n,p,alpha).
If an EVO splits in two, with the two being entangled, the pair could be separated through 10 billion light years and they could be used to instantly communicate via a wormhole over ten billon light years. (See video)
How do you plan to separate these entangled universes EVOs by 10 billion light years?
If you plan on moving it there, this would be a "timelike" interval.
You cannot create a "spacelike" separation by splitting an EVO and moving it.
Since the Universe is not much more than 10 billion years old (well if you believe the big bang), an entangled EVO at 10 billion light years would have had to have split in the relatively early times of the universe and somehow they miraculously accelerated to near light speed away from each other.
This seems weird to me, but maybe that's just me.
However I think this does prove that your theories are "spaced-out-like".
Edit: On second thought, your theories are more "loony-timelike"
Display MoreHow do you plan to separate these entangled
universesEVOs by 10 billion light years?If you plan on moving it there, this would be a "timelike" interval.
You cannot create a "spacelike" separation by splitting an EVO and moving it.
Since the Universe is not much more than 10 billion years old (well if you believe the big bang), an entangled EVO at 10 billion light years would have had to have split in the relatively early times of the universe and somehow they miraculously accelerated to near light speed away from each other.
This seems weird to me, but maybe that's just me.
However I think this does prove that your theories are "spaced-out-like".
Edit: On second thought, your theories are more "loony-timelike"
If you had watched Leonard Susskind video, you would understand, and you might also learn something.
Leonard Susskind
His first love ,one of them, was QCD .
.but its grown old ... fifty years
50 years and QCD still cannot model the 250 or so stable atomic nuclei
but its amazing how Susskind can make a story...
