My "wild claim" is that the evidence is too dodgy and we should wait and see.
Your claim is that you know for sure, with no evidence, that Rossi is not building a factory and has never had anything that worked.
It looks like you need to learn to parse what is written and master basic logic.
Rewriting history again -- your claim was not "that the evidence is too dodgy and we should wait and see." Your claim was that you had confirmation and independent information that the factory was being built. Just a weeeee difference.