Has anyone here learned anything at all from Axil's fantastical explanations? Is it just me who is so stupid and sees them as nonsensical? Or are we all just too stupid?
As he is entirely in the theoretical side, I really don’t pay him much attention. If he ever starts doing experiments or teaming up with someone doing experiments, he may eventually be proven right or wrong.
As he is entirely in the theoretical side,
You mix up spreading comics with ....
Been a welder some 20 year and seen meany a argon c02 welding gas mig welding balls bounce down the shop floor 15 yards and pop or sometimes they just spin when they land.
are you all talking about something else ?
Ps, and likely paints from the 80s to 2000 V.O.C. the usa will not use. Chlorinated Rubber type paints and primers ect. being melted ..
As he is entirely in the theoretical side, I really don’t pay him much attention. If he ever starts doing experiments or teaming up with someone doing experiments, he may eventually be proven right or wrong.
Experiments have been done that show me to be right.
Here is one opinion that I know you won't like.
The important implication of the BEC theory of the EVO is that many hundreds of man years of validated research into BECs can be applied to the EVO mechanism. For one thing, the EVO will form a supersolid whose results have been seen in the LION diamond observations. In the video B. Greenyer asked "how it could happen": the formation of hexagonal, square, and triangular tunnels. The fact that the EVOs dig hexagonal profiled tunnels show that those EVOs are supersolids when fully mature. When the EVO is young and first starts out their life cycle, they take on the form of a BEC as you have seen in imprints of EVOs on metal walls.
There is no toroidal motion of any electron based current involved with the EVO mechanism. The young EVO circulates based on the BEC interlaced chiral photon current, but when the polariton aggregation grows dense, a supersolid lattice forms, the polaritons stay rigidly in place without moving, yet the BEC still shows the superfluid movement that KEN had observed and as a supersolid produces.
Supersolid.
QuoteIn condensed matter physics, a supersolid is a spatially ordered material with superfluid properties.
A supersolid is a special quantum state of matter where particles form a rigid, spatially ordered structure, but also flow with zero viscosity.
The Zurich group placed a Bose–Einstein condensate inside two optical resonators, which enhanced the atomic interactions until they started to spontaneously crystallize and form a solid that maintains the inherent superfluidity of Bose–Einstein condensates.[9][10] This setting realises a special form of a supersolid, t<u><i><b>he so-called lattice supersolid, </b></i></u>where atoms are pinned to the sites of an externally imposed lattice structure.
The fact that the EVO is a BEC implies a supersolid nature which is a quantum state of matter where particles form a rigid, spatially ordered structure, but also flow with zero viscosity. A supersolid can be hexagonal, square, or another shape:
Hexagonal: Simulations predict that a temperature quench can create a reproducible hexagonal 7-droplet supersolid. Experimentally, a seven-droplet hexagonal supersolid was obtained and its high coherence was confirmed by studying the interference pattern obtained after releasing the atoms from the trap.
Square: A study observed the supersolid crystallized in a square shape.
A supersolid simultaneously has two orders, solid and super:
Solid: Because of the spatially repeating pattern of particles
Super: Because the particles can flow without resistance
The supersolid phase can be generally defined as one that combines typical crystalline properties, such as shear modulus and broken translation symmetry, with frictionless mass transport through the solid bulk.
Experiments have been done that show me to be right.
AFAIK, The only person that agrees with that statement is you.
The fact that the EVOs dig hexagonal profiled tunnels show that those EVOs are supersolids when fully mature. When the EVO is young and first starts out their life cycle, they take on the form of a BEC as you have seen in imprints of EVOs on metal walls.
Unfortunately hexagonal artifacts are not uncommon in EM studies (even in diamonds)
"It is not the first time, and unfortunately maybe not the last time, that researchers are confused by diffraction artefacts and think they discovered a “new” hexagonal phase, or more generally a new superstructure. The list of papers would be too long to establish; we will just mention some of them. Some have reported the formation of the ω phase in tantalum after extreme laser deformation [17], but the study suffers the same problems as Ping's ones in steels. The positions and intensities of the spots in the SAED of Fig. 2 of [17] are the same as those of Fig. 3, and they can be equally indexed by double diffraction and streaking effects. Many also claimed for the existence of a 9R phase in pure aluminium and Al alloys, for examples [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], but here again, the HRTEM images shown in these works, such as those reproduced in Fig. 4ab, are nothing else than moiré fringes created by overlapped twins. There are also numerous papers claiming the existence of a 9R structure of copper precipitates in iron and steels [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], or in copper after irradiation at high temperature [29]; but the only proofs given in these works are here again HRTEM images along <110> zone axes, such as that reproduced in Fig. 4c, that show actually only moiré fringes. The moiré are easily recognized by the fact that the contrasts change all along the interfaces. During the TEM session, the microscopist can also feel the artefact by the impossibility to correctly focalize the image. The illusion of 9R does not stop to metals and alloys. Recently, exotic structures of carbon, such ‘M-diamond’ (‘M’ for monoclinic]) and other polytypes such as 2H, 4H, 9R and 15R were reported in papers published in Nature"
Yes, the formation of hexagonal crystal structures are common in solids
They may well be though there are only 36 known truly hexagonal crystalline minerals, and 6 other structural groups which are more common. . But they can also be electron diffraction artifacts, which is what the paper I linked in #928 above is about..
"It is not the first time, and unfortunately maybe not the last time, that researchers are confused by diffraction artefacts and think they discovered a “new” hexagonal phase, or more generally a new superstructure...
As he is entirely in the theoretical side, I really don’t pay him much attention. If he ever starts doing experiments or teaming up with someone doing experiments, he may eventually be proven right or wrong.
He is not on the theoretical side because a physics theory requires math, or it is not a theory.
All he has is mixed up buzzwords that keep changing every few weeks.
There truly is no theory to test. As good old Wolfy P. said, "Not Even Wrong".
Don't forget the production of triangular holes and tunnels were also produced.
Show me a reference for this process.
The paper on artefacts above mentions 'polytypes' . For your benefit I will explain - it means 'similar but different forms'. As for 'holes' they can also be artifacts caused by poor coating technique or what is called 'charging' ...
Try this short video. https://www.sciencelearn.org.n…/305-artefacts-in-the-sem
Thanks for the feedback. Keep trying.
🤣
He is not on the theoretical side because a physics theory requires math, or it is not a theory.
All he has is mixed up buzzwords that keep changing every few weeks.
There truly is no theory to test. As good old Wolfy P. said, "Not Even Wrong".
He is in the “argumental side” then. Happy?
I have wondered why Ken Shoulders changed the name of the EVO from EV. It may have been his contemplations about the nature of vacuum permeability as applied to the EVO. Vacuum permeability is a physical constant that quantifies the strength of a magnetic field emitted by an electric current in a vacuum. It is also known as the magnetic constant or the permeability of free space. The symbol for vacuum permeability is μ0.
Nothing of the kind. Originally he gave it a Latin tag - from memory 'Electrum Validum' or something like that. This was because it was a new species of macro particle related to the electron and he liked the idea of using a Linnean name for it.Then his main scientific colleague Hal Puthoff suggested that it should have a more descriptive name. Exotic Vacuum Object..
Thanks for the feedback. Keep trying.
In all seriousness Axil, here is some honest feedback.
You claim to have a theory but I have not seen any concise writeup about what the theory is, and the various explanations are constantly changing.
Concise does not mean stringing together marginally related physics terms. It means concise and simple in the Occam's Razor sense.
I would sincerely request you write up a more formal paper explaining what your theory is, as you see your theory today.
In it, there should be mathematical equations which can be used to make predictions from your theory.
A theory without any predictive capability is not useful. Also a theory cannot include links or cut and paste sections from Wikipedia or other pop-sci sources.
If you have trouble with the math portion, and if your theory really qualifies as one, there are people here who could help you fine tune the math.
I happily volunteer Wyttenbach to help you develop your mathematics.
This paper will also be useful a couple of days later when you completely change your description, thus reminding you to keep focused.
This paper should be posted for public access, even if just on ResearchGate, to get critiques and "Peer Reviews".
Finally we could submit this paper to certain LENR friendly professors and researchers for review.
You must be able to constructively handle the criticism they might offer.
A Leak From Our Universe to Another
by
Ken Shoulders © 2006
QuoteDisplay MoreApparently, a physical matter leak occurs between our Universe and another still unexplored one. All that has to be done to show this effect is to generate an EVO and let it subside to its natural black state limit, whereupon it disappears from our cognition. This produces a highly unexpected but actual disappearance of matter that is accomplished on an everyday basis. The frequency of this event occurs at an astoundingly high rate and the precursors can be seen in natural lightning events like that shown by the author in the essay, EVO Life Cycle.
This reference, along with other writings and background material on allied subjects, can be downloaded from: http://www.svn.net/krscfs/. This black EVO state can even be occasionally seen from such simple events as a spark discharge formed by moving ones body across a rug or car seat and then touching a conductor. The needed quiescent black state is not as frequent as the more normal visible spark, but it is common enough to be ranked above insignificant.
When seeking a physical analogy for the driving force behind this process, which always occurs to produce a blacker EVO state in the absence of disturbance, a pressure analogy can be evoked. A driving force is seen to occur between the higher-pressure side of our white Universe and the other or black Universe residing in an effectively lower pressure region of space. It might even be appropriate to signify that the black universe identified here is the much-touted dark matter regime, which is said to dominate in quantity over our normal matter.
If this interpretation can be taken as a valid analogy, then the black hole type of EVO we generate locally becomes a connector or conduit for all sorts of new communication to another Universe, albeit, at this time, a seemingly unidirectional one.
A reverse flow of matter, or recharge of our local domain on Earth from the dark domain, is possible
through particle bombardment from the sun or from capture of WIMPS as matter supplied from the dark side. We could still benefit from this event if the WIMP captor were to be our sun, which then passed the normal matter on to us as a resupply of leaked matter.
This observation by Ken Shoulders is likely due to the way the EVO distroys matter and makes it disappear. An example of this is seen in the LION experiment where tunnels are created in diamond in a way where there is no indications of energy production. The tunnels are regular and smooth with no trace of heat or explosive excavation. There is also no trace where the material taken from those tunnels went.
It looks like for all intents and purposes that the material is being teleported to another universe and this in fact may be what is actually happening. The science behind this behavior has actually been formulated.
Bubble universes and traversable wormholes
arXiv:2201.02203v1
QuoteBubble universes and traversable wormholes in general relativity can be realized as two sides of the same concept. To exemplify it, we find, display, and study in a unified manner a Minkowski- Minkowski closed universe and a Minkowski-Minkowski traversable wormhole. By joining two 3- dimensional flat balls along a thin shell two-sphere of matter, i.e., a spherical domain wall, into a single spacetime one gets a Minkowski-Minkowski static closed universe, i.e., a bubble universe. By joining two 3-dimensional complements of flat balls along a thin shell two-sphere of matter, i.e., a spherical throat, into a single spacetime one gets a Minkowski-Minkowski static open universe which is a traversable wormhole. Thus, Minkowski-Minkowski bubble universes and wormholes can be seen as complementary to each other. Is is also striking that these two spacetimes, the Minkowski- Minkowski bubble universe and the Minkowski-Minkowski traversable wormhole, have resemblances with two well-known static universes of general relativity. The Minkowski-Minkowski static closed universe, i.e., the Minkowski-Minkowski bubble universe, resembles in many aspects the Einstein universe, i.e., a static closed spherical universe homogeneously filled with dust matter and with a cosmological constant. The Minkowski-Minkowski static open universe, i.e., the Minkowski-Minkowski traversable wormhole, resembles the Friedmann static universe, i.e., a static open hyperbolic universe homogeneously filled with negative energy density dust and with a negative cosmological, which is a universe with two disjoint branes, or branches, that can be considered a failed wormhole. In this light, the Einstein static closed universe and the Friedmann static open universe should also be seen as two sides of the same concept, i.e., they are complementary to each other. The scheme is completed by performing a linear stability analysis for the Minkowski-Minkowski bubble universe and the Minkowski-Minkowski traversable wormhole and also by comparing it to the stability of the Einstein static universe and the Friedmann static universe, respectively. The complementarity between bubble universes and traversable wormholes, that exists for these instances of static spacetimes, can be can carried out for dynamical spacetimes, indicating that such a complementarity is quite general. The overall study suggests that bubble universes and traversable wormholes can be seen as coming out of the same concept, and thus, if ones exist the others should also exist.
This description of the bubble universe is close to what I have come to beleive what the EVO is.
It is a bubble of spacetime that is populated with negative energy density and a cosmological constant that is negative. It is anti-de Sutter space protected by a domain wall that sequestered both matter and energy from observation from our universe. Matter and energy can be shared between these EVO. It is seen that in the LION diamond experiment that transmuted matter was shared by the thousands of EVO. All these EVOs showed at the end of their tunnel the same transmuted elements in the form a micro-ball.
See the Diamond analysis video here
So matter and energy can travel between EVOs via wormholes.
In his experimentation, Ken Shoulders saw all this and he often remarked on the way EVOs were otherworldly.
