The church of SM physics

Quote from Alan Smith

This is an interesting paper from Edward Teller. 50 years old now, in this paper he has a lot to say about electrets, electromagnetism, and gravity.

According to Edward Teller, rotation causes electric polarization of solids, and according to Siparov (anisotropic geometrodynamics), rotation on astronomical scales causes an additional force (an addition to Newton's law), which eliminates the need for dark matter and dark energy. Thus, according to Siparov, rotation also acts on gravity. Let me remind you that, according to my assumptions, rotation also acts on LENR.

Cherepanov2020

So show us. You never actually show us anything new arising from your theory or views. I still want to know how you explain the 'Hall Effect', which has proven so important is studying semiconductor properties.

In studying precession of the electron in the hydrogen atom one needs to introduce directions for the magnetic moments and operating forces. It's this need to be specific that is at issue here, not the relative distances.

I see you don't know the size of the electron either. That is one of the things that vexes me, so I prefer to let the electron be deformable (can be compressed).

Concerning the model for the neutron: Note that it is very hard to make one (takes the pressures from the collapse of the core of a star), but is easy to get rid of (just let it alone for awhile). As I see it, the decay of a neutron comes about because of the distortion of the magnetic fields (like in the model I suggested). The instability that leads to decay is built in.

Here is a video from "see the pattern" about QED and some historical perspective....

Quote from GRMattson

Concerning the model for the neutron: Note that it is very hard to make one (takes the pressures from the collapse of the core of a star)

What about beta+ decay? That will make a 'neutron' and no neutron starts needed...

Edo

I presume you are referring to an emission of a positron. There seems to be some argument as to whether the positron is somehow contained in the nucleus or is created as part of the emission. I tend toward the latter point of view. But an electron is also created in that case. I take the view that charge is always being created and destroyed spontaneously at the level of the quantum foam, but always in a way to keep the net change in charge equal to zero. Considering that an isolated magnetic pole has never being found I think that point of view would be consistent with Wyttenbach's theory, as even the higher order magnetic fields must have two poles.

In any case, the creation of the extra electron would give the illusion of the creation of a neutron.

In the case of decay of thorium to lead six alpha particles are emitted. So twelve electrons must also be emitted. The emission of a positron would require an extra electron to be emitted. Can you track that process? Can anyone? There is a project for you. Or find another process that is easier to track to prove that a fission process can produce a neutron.

Anomaly in proton structure.. not predicted by quarks,,

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.11461

" This striking contradiction to the theoretical predictions suggests that scientific understanding of the strong interaction that binds the proton’s elementary quark and gluon constituents together may be missing a key dynamical element.

This presents a significant challenge to the prevalent theory."

Decoding the Proton’s Response to an External Electromagnetic Field

New measurements show the proton’s electromagnetic structure deviates from theoretical predictions.

www.energy.gov

Dear Robert, could it help the hydrino theory ?

Quote from RobertBryant

Anomaly in proton structure.. not predicted by quarks,,

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.11461

" This striking contradiction to the theoretical predictions suggests that scientific understanding of the strong interaction that binds the proton’s elementary quark and gluon constituents together may be missing a key dynamical element.

This presents a significant challenge to the prevalent theory."

https://www.energy.gov/science…nal-electromagnetic-field

Display More

Quote from Cydonia

could it help the hydrino theory

electric polarizability of the proton is not in GUTCP...as of .the year,, 2020

but 250 or more as yet unidentified hydrinos (UHOs) are,,,

Quote from GRMattson

Cherepanov2020

Такскажи по нам. На самом деле вы никогда не показываете ничего нового, вытекающего из нашей теории или взглядов. Я все еще хочу знать, как вы повышаете эффект «холла», который является чрезвычайно важным при изучении свойств полупроводников.

В исследовании прецессии электрона в атоме необходимо ввести для магнитных моментов и возможной силы. Здесь речь идет именно о необходимости быть эмоциональными, а не об относительными отношениях.

Я вижу, вы тоже не знаете размер электрона. Это одна из вещей, которая меня раздражает, поэтому я предпочитаю, чтобы электрон был деформируемым (может быть сжатым).

Относительно модели нейтрона: обратите внимание, что ее очень трудно создать (используется давление от коллапса ядра звезды), но от легко обнаруживаемого (просто встречается ее на французском языке время в покое). На мой взгляд, распад нейтрона происходит из-за искажения магнитных полей (как в предложенной мной модели). Нестабильность, которая вызывается к распаду, встроена.

Display More

Специально для Вас я снял 5 частей своих видео -

Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0Z6-LPcMdg

Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 2 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sXhUMIGE3k

Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 3 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nz1YRSvoo4s

Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 4 — https :// www . ютуб . ком / смотреть ? v = ORqpdpTSbj 4

Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 5 - https :// www . ютуб . ком / смотреть ? v = ihkpINFIw - k

Доклад Авшарова Е.М. -

«Законы ведут и классическая Игровая эксперимент XXI, теория и практика», 15 февраля 2022 года - https :// www . ютуб . ком / смотреть ? v =VbAKlOOabTs

Quote from RobertBryant

unidentified hydrinos (UHOs)

rather than any "hydrino"

my favorite monster in the SM bedtime story is the "antibottom"

Quote from RobertBryant

rather than any "hydrino"

my favorite monster in the SM bedtime story is the "antibottom"

A synonym for bottom-quark is beauty quark, so anti-bottom should be renamed as ugliness or inelegance quark!

bottom quark - Wiktionary

beauty quark - Wiktionary

Quote from Wyttenbach

Today I added a new paper to research_gate https://www.researchgate.net/p…67405461_Basics_of_fields

Physics journals do not like news that refute century old claims and contradict standard books of physics like Jackson.

Basic finding:: There are no real 1/r fields. Thus all physics (QM/QED, etc.) that uses this simplification is toy physics for the child yard. Also the Gauss flux law does not hold for a homogeneous surface charge as Jackson claims. This has huge implications.

Thank you for this paper. For once, I could understand it at first reading.I'm still struggling to understand your SO4.

weiß nicht ob schon gepostet....

Optical superluminal motion measurement in the neutron-star merger GW170817 - Nature

Optical superluminal motion in the binary neutron-star merger GW170817 is used to constrain the speed and morphology of the structured jet, and…

www.nature.com

"Energiestrahl reist mit 7-facher Lichtgeschwindigkeit"

interessant!

...

...

How the newest taxpayer funded collider and the superhero Higgs boson

will save humanity...

or not..