Concerning the model for the neutron: Note that it is very hard to make one (takes the pressures from the collapse of the core of a star)
What about beta+ decay? That will make a 'neutron' and no neutron starts needed...
Concerning the model for the neutron: Note that it is very hard to make one (takes the pressures from the collapse of the core of a star)
What about beta+ decay? That will make a 'neutron' and no neutron starts needed...
I presume you are referring to an emission of a positron. There seems to be some argument as to whether the positron is somehow contained in the nucleus or is created as part of the emission. I tend toward the latter point of view. But an electron is also created in that case. I take the view that charge is always being created and destroyed spontaneously at the level of the quantum foam, but always in a way to keep the net change in charge equal to zero. Considering that an isolated magnetic pole has never being found I think that point of view would be consistent with Wyttenbach's theory, as even the higher order magnetic fields must have two poles.
In any case, the creation of the extra electron would give the illusion of the creation of a neutron.
In the case of decay of thorium to lead six alpha particles are emitted. So twelve electrons must also be emitted. The emission of a positron would require an extra electron to be emitted. Can you track that process? Can anyone? There is a project for you. Or find another process that is easier to track to prove that a fission process can produce a neutron.
Anomaly in proton structure.. not predicted by quarks,,
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.11461
" This striking contradiction to the theoretical predictions suggests that scientific understanding of the strong interaction that binds the proton’s elementary quark and gluon constituents together may be missing a key dynamical element.
This presents a significant challenge to the prevalent theory."
Dear Robert, could it help the hydrino theory ?
Display MoreAnomaly in proton structure.. not predicted by quarks,,
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.11461
" This striking contradiction to the theoretical predictions suggests that scientific understanding of the strong interaction that binds the proton’s elementary quark and gluon constituents together may be missing a key dynamical element.
This presents a significant challenge to the prevalent theory."
https://www.energy.gov/science…nal-electromagnetic-field
could it help the hydrino theory
electric polarizability of the proton is not in GUTCP...as of .the year,, 2020
but 250 or more as yet unidentified hydrinos (UHOs) are,,,
Display More
Такскажи по нам. На самом деле вы никогда не показываете ничего нового, вытекающего из нашей теории или взглядов. Я все еще хочу знать, как вы повышаете эффект «холла», который является чрезвычайно важным при изучении свойств полупроводников.
В исследовании прецессии электрона в атоме необходимо ввести для магнитных моментов и возможной силы. Здесь речь идет именно о необходимости быть эмоциональными, а не об относительными отношениях.
Я вижу, вы тоже не знаете размер электрона. Это одна из вещей, которая меня раздражает, поэтому я предпочитаю, чтобы электрон был деформируемым (может быть сжатым).
Относительно модели нейтрона: обратите внимание, что ее очень трудно создать (используется давление от коллапса ядра звезды), но от легко обнаруживаемого (просто встречается ее на французском языке время в покое). На мой взгляд, распад нейтрона происходит из-за искажения магнитных полей (как в предложенной мной модели). Нестабильность, которая вызывается к распаду, встроена.
Специально для Вас я снял 5 частей своих видео -
Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0Z6-LPcMdg
Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 2 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sXhUMIGE3k
Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 3 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nz1YRSvoo4s
Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 4 — https :// www . ютуб . ком / смотреть ? v = ORqpdpTSbj 4
Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 5 - https :// www . ютуб . ком / смотреть ? v = ihkpINFIw - k
Доклад Авшарова Е.М. -
«Законы ведут и классическая Игровая эксперимент XXI, теория и практика», 15 февраля 2022 года - https :// www . ютуб . ком / смотреть ? v =VbAKlOOabTs
unidentified hydrinos (UHOs)
rather than any "hydrino"
my favorite monster in the SM bedtime story is the "antibottom"
rather than any "hydrino"
my favorite monster in the SM bedtime story is the "antibottom"
A synonym for bottom-quark is beauty quark, so anti-bottom should be renamed as ugliness or inelegance quark!
A synonym for bottom-quark is beauty quark, so anti-bottom should be renamed as ugliness or inelegance quark!
I guess most of particle physicist are completely drunk! How else could one claim that something with mass > 938MeV can exist inside the proton or be a part of the proton structure? We all know that 52 MeV are enough to crack a proton into 2 Kaon's. So claiming forces/potentials inside a proton in the range of several GeV is definitely covered by Dürenmatt's stage play "the physicists".
= Total metal disturbance....
Today I added a new paper to research_gate https://www.researchgate.net/p…67405461_Basics_of_fields
Physics journals do not like news that refute century old claims and contradict standard books of physics like Jackson.
Basic finding:: There are no real 1/r fields. Thus all physics (QM/QED, etc.) that uses this simplification is toy physics for the child yard. Also the Gauss flux law does not hold for a homogeneous surface charge as Jackson claims. This has huge implications.
Today I added a new paper to research_gate https://www.researchgate.net/p…67405461_Basics_of_fields
Physics journals do not like news that refute century old claims and contradict standard books of physics like Jackson.
Basic finding:: There are no real 1/r fields. Thus all physics (QM/QED, etc.) that uses this simplification is toy physics for the child yard. Also the Gauss flux law does not hold for a homogeneous surface charge as Jackson claims. This has huge implications.
Thank you for this paper. For once, I could understand it at first reading.I'm still struggling to understand your SO4.
I'm still struggling to understand your SO4.
The same happened to to GR - general relativity. Not even Einstein did understand it. GR is pure math and as such highly important. For physics it has zero relevance despite a never ending flow of people that claim other wise.
Fields have sources. Fields can only be detected by forces. Forces have an origin not so in GR...
weiß nicht ob schon gepostet....
"Energiestrahl reist mit 7-facher Lichtgeschwindigkeit"
interessant!
...
The speed of light "c" is no limit in cosmological dimensions. What simpel minded physicists ignore is that general relativity (GR) only works in a so called closed system. The universe is an open system as we have no mean to define a boarder etc...
Most cosmological papers based of GR are just educated nonsense.
...
How the newest taxpayer funded collider and the superhero Higgs boson
will save humanity...
or not..
the superhero Higgs boson
CERN never found a Higgs boson as the particle they name so has no properties of a fictive idea named Higgs boson. The energy of about 126GeV is known since more than 20 years and nobody called it Higgs boson until the search for the fiction failed...
Nobody did predict a pair of Higgs bosons... That in reality is fat proton which mass is easy to calculate if you understand the proton structure that is unknown to the dumb standard model physicists.
Cold nuclear fusion theories. Exploration of exotic hydrogen states
Bergen Open Research Archive: Cold nuclear fusion theories. Exploration of exotic hydrogen states
That in reality is fat proton which mass is easy to calculate if you understand the proton structure that is unknown to the dumb standard model physicists.
So the CMS coalition of 4000 of the best minds in physics
doesn't really need a 13 TEV collision to find a fat proton..
Its just as well, since it takes 10 years for the data to become public and 10 more years of salary
"Completing the delivery of Run-1 data within 10 years after data taking reaffirms the CMS collaboration’s commitment to its open data policy.
CMS completes the release of its entire Run-1 proton-proton data | CMS Experiment
"
n the CERN fake Higgs situation because in a crash symmetry
never will increase and the formation of 4He needs a 4 fold symmetry.
As we, in a collision, can only stimulate the 3D,t visible site of a particle
we also do only see a 2D compression.
"But as soon as CERN was aware that this simple derivation would end their happy live they started to fudge
the measurements and to suppress the second (higher) proton resonance mass.
In the most recent papers
https://www.researchgate.net/project/Nuclear-and-particle-physics-20-new-SO4-physics